Why Does a Charged Particle in a Magnetic Field Perform Circular Motion?

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle moving in a uniform magnetic field experiences a force that is always perpendicular to its velocity, resulting in circular motion. The work done by this force is zero, as it does not change the particle's speed. The radius of curvature for the motion can be expressed as r = mv/(Bq), where m is the mass, v is the velocity, B is the magnetic flux density, and q is the charge. The discussion clarifies that uniform circular motion is the only outcome when the magnetic force is constant and perpendicular to the velocity. Any deviation from circular motion would imply work done by the magnetic field, contradicting the established conditions.
KLscilevothma
Messages
315
Reaction score
0
http://www.geocities.com/bridgestein/Bffield.jpg
(copy and paste the above address to your browser please)

In fact I know the answers of this problem, but I have a question.

Here's the question.
A charge +q moving with constant velocity v enters into a uniform magnetic field region as shown. The magnetic flux density is B.
a) What is the direction of the force F experienced by q?
b) What is the work done by F?
c) What kind of motion it is performing?
d) Express the radius of curvature r of the change in terms of B, v, m and q. Where m is the mass of the charge.

ans:
a) Direction of force is always perpendicular to the direction of q. The point charge will go upward.

From the part (d), I know it is performing circular motion and that the work done by F is 0 J!

d) r = mv/(Bq)

Why it is performing circular motion? Can't it be an elliptical motion?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by KL Kam
Why it is performing circular motion? Can't it be an elliptical motion?

When you have a constant magnitude force that is always perpendicular to the velocity, uniform circular motion is the only possible result. To show this, you can use Newton's second law for the radial component of the force (that is the only nonzero component in this problem):

ΣFr=qvxB=mar

where v=vi and B=-Bk. You would then solve the differential equation for the trajectory, using the initial conditions, to see that the path is necessarily circular.
 
Also, if the motion were elliptical, the acceleration would not be perpendicular to the motion and the magnetic field would therefore do work, which is contradictory to your (correct) answer to b).
 
Thanks Tom and Claude Bile
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top