Light Intensity: Calculating Energy Flux through an Area Element

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a light intensity calculation involving a 40 W bulb and a 40 cm² area element. The formula for intensity, I = Power/Area, is highlighted, but confusion arises regarding the absence of a time reference in the initial problem. Once a time duration of 4 seconds is introduced, the calculation becomes straightforward, leading to the conclusion that 160 joules of energy pass through the area in that time. The importance of including time in energy calculations is emphasized. Ultimately, the problem is resolved by applying the formula W = Pt.
davidphysics
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Light Intensity question

The light (electromagnetic) output of a bulb is 40 W. How much energy passes through a 40 cm^2 area element aligned perp. to the light rays?

I know that I = Power/Area, but I thought that Power = W(aka. energy) /t , and the problem has no reference to time.

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without time this question is meaningless.
 
Yea we told our teacher, so now the t= 4 seconds, and obviously now the problem is super easy. W=Pt

W= 40 W (4 s)

W=160 J
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top