Relativistic length, 2 viewpoints

pacu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem statement:

Two identical cyclists ride past each other with constant velocities Va and Vb, which are close to the speed of light. Can it be that cyclist A perceives cyclist B as shorter or longer that cyclist B perceives cyclist A ? Or simply La is NOT equal to Lb ? (La-length of cyclist A as seen by cyclist B, Lb -length of cyclist B as seen by cyclist A).

Relevant formulas:

Relative speed V = Va+Vb/(1+(Va*Vb/c^2))
Relative length l = lo * square root from 1-(V/c)^2

Conclusion:

The V from the second equation is equal for both cyclists, since addition and multiplication are alternate. lo is also equal. So there is no difference in the way cyclists A and B see each other.

Is this conclusion right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
its correct if the cyclists are the same length to begin with.

dont forget that there is also a loss of simultaneity. once you factor that in it stops seeming so impossible.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top