How Does Batman's Jump Impact the Speed of a Getaway Boat?

AI Thread Summary
Batman jumps from a bridge into a fleeing boat, initially moving at +15 m/s, and the problem explores the resulting velocity after his jump. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on whether Batman's jump is vertical and the mass of the criminal in the boat. Participants debate the conservation of energy versus momentum, concluding that momentum should be applied since the collision is non-elastic. The final velocity of the boat after Batman lands is calculated to be 13.7 m/s, highlighting that potential energy does not impact horizontal motion. The conversation underscores the importance of precise problem statements in physics discussions.
wallace13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Batman (mass = 105 kg) jumps straight down from a bridge into a boat (mass = 530 kg) in which a criminal is fleeing. The velocity of the boat is initially +15 m/s. What is the velocity of the boat after Batman lands in it?
.5mv squared + mghf = .5mVi squared + Mghi.5 x 635 x Vf squared = .5 x 530 x 15 squared

= 13.7m/s
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I mean that's quite a funny and not specific problem. Does batman jump vertically from the bridge? do you mean this by "straight down"? If yes then ok. What is the mass of the criminal? Or this the given "boat" the sum of the mass of the boat itself and the criminal?
You should be a bit more specific... :D :D
Now is the water considered "solid", because otherwise I could well imagine that someone with fifth the mass of a boat jump on it, and it collapsed or submerged into the water, which is another case...:D this should be specified too.. :D
(I am not "bugging" with these, just in the future it is better if you specify these, because then it will be much more comprehendible :D)

If we have all these. Then we can go onto the solution. Now why would you say that energy is conserved in this case? The "collision" between Batman and the boat is totaly non-elastic (If we consider the water to be "solid"), hence energy is not conserved, so your solution is wrong.
But if we consider batman to jump verticaly then the horizontal momentum is conserved, since there is no horizontal force.

So use the conservation of momentum in the horizontal direction.
 
I copied the problem straight out of the book lol our book just sucks
 
wallace13 said:
Batman (mass = 105 kg) jumps straight down from a bridge into a boat (mass = 530 kg) in which a criminal is fleeing. The velocity of the boat is initially +15 m/s. What is the velocity of the boat after Batman lands in it?

.5mv squared + mghf = .5mVi squared + Mghi

.5 x 635 x Vf squared = .5 x 530 x 15 squared

= 13.7m/s

This is not a kinetic energy problem. The potential energy from his jump does not affect the combined horizontal motion.

What's asked is for you to apply the conservation of momentum.

Mass X Velocity before = Mass X Velocity after
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top