Wheatstone Bridge Strain Gauge Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's confusion regarding negative strain measurements obtained from a Wheatstone Bridge strain gauge setup on a cantilevered beam. The student used a Half-Bridge configuration with two gauges in tension, yet received a negative strain result, prompting questions about the measurement process. Clarifications indicate that the negative value arises from the subtraction of one gauge's measurement from the other, which is a standard practice in this configuration to quantify differential strain. The conversation also touches on the importance of correctly applying the resistance to strain formula, as reversing the numerator can lead to negative results. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes understanding the principles behind the Wheatstone Bridge and the interpretation of strain measurements.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I recently did a bending lab with a WB Strain Gauge in a bunch of different configurations.

One measurement in particular is bothering me. Referring to the figure below, there are four strain gauges, Yellow, Orange, Black and Red mounted to a cantilevered beam with an applied loading 'P.'

I had the data acquisition system output a measurement for a Half-Bridge configuration in which R1 = RYellow and R2 = ROrange

We can see from the figure that both of the gauges are in tension. So why is the strain measurement that I got negative? It is effectively taking the strain measured from the yellow gauge and subtracting it from the strain ,measured from the orange gauge. Why does it do that? What exactly is this quantifying?
bridge.jpg


Thanks,
Casey

Also: I thought maybe I screwed this up, but the Lab Assistant had all of the 'approximate expected strains' and mine matched up pretty well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.
 
Harry Hazard said:
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.

Hey there :smile: Thanks for having a look, but just to clarify:

I never said that my sign was wrong. I just don't understand what is being measured here. Why does the half bridge take one measurement and subtract it from the other? What does that get me?

Thanks!
 
Oops! I misread that. :D

You measure the voltage between two opposite points, let's say "North" and "South" if your bridge has the diamond configuration. And you apply a voltage from "West" to "East". On the South bridge, you have two known resistors. On the North, you have one known resistor and one unknown resistor(the strain gage). You can solve for the unknown resistor using the known resistors and voltages. And at this point, once I get my scanner working, I'll scan in my notes on it. lol
 
Back
Top