How Are Quantum Numbers Assigned to the Last Electron in an Aluminum Atom?

AI Thread Summary
The four quantum numbers for the last electron in an aluminum (Al) atom are 3 (primary), 1 (secondary/azimuthal), -1 (magnetic), and +1/2 (spin). The secondary/azimuthal quantum number is calculated using the formula n-1, where n is the primary quantum number; thus, for Al, it is 2. The magnetic quantum number ranges from -l to +l, with l being the secondary quantum number, allowing for values such as -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2. The book's value of -1 corresponds to a p orbital orientation. Understanding these quantum numbers is essential for grasping electron configurations and their implications in quantum mechanics.
vg19
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hi,

What are the 4 quantum numbers for the last electron in the Al atom? I know how to get the primary quantum number and the spin quantum nmber, but I do not now how to get the secondary/azmuthal quantum number, and the magnetic quantum number.

The book gives the secondary/azmuthal quantum number as 1 "p", and the magnetic quantum number as -1

How do I get this values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vg19 said:
Hi,

What are the 4 quantum numbers for the last electron in the Al atom? I know how to get the primary quantum number and the spin quantum nmber, but I do not now how to get the secondary/azmuthal quantum number, and the magnetic quantum number.

The book gives the secondary/azmuthal quantum number as 1 "p", and the magnetic quantum number as -1

How do I get this values?
what shell is the last one in?

n = 3

what kindof shell

L = 1 (p shell)

what is the ml

since -L <= ml <= +L

and the negative one being the first subshell (px) and the positive one being the last subshell(pz)

and what is Ms?

Ms = +/- 1/2

where the positives are the first ones in and the negatives and the second ones in each of the subshells

draw anaenergy level diagram if you have a problem with this
 


The four quantum numbers for the last electron in an Al atom are: 3 (primary quantum number), 1 (secondary/azimuthal quantum number), -1 (magnetic quantum number), and +1/2 (spin quantum number). These numbers can be obtained by applying the rules and principles of quantum mechanics and electron configuration.

To find the secondary/azimuthal quantum number, you can use the formula n-1, where n is the primary quantum number. In the case of Al, the primary quantum number is 3, so the secondary/azimuthal quantum number would be 2 (3-1=2). The secondary/azimuthal quantum number represents the shape of the electron's orbital, and in this case, it is a p orbital.

The magnetic quantum number, represented by the letter m, determines the orientation of the electron's orbital in space. It can have values ranging from -l to +l, where l is the secondary/azimuthal quantum number. In the case of Al, l=2, so the possible values for m would be -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2. The book gave the value of -1, which would correspond to a p orbital with a specific orientation in space.

I hope this helps in understanding how to obtain the values for the secondary/azimuthal and magnetic quantum numbers. Remember, these numbers are determined by the electron's energy level and the rules of quantum mechanics, so they can vary for different elements.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top