Finding Moment of Inertia of Rod

AI Thread Summary
To find the moment of inertia of a rod with linear density λ=4.0 kg/m and length L=4 m, the total mass M is calculated as M=λL, resulting in M=16 kg. The moment of inertia about the center of mass is given by the formula I=1/12 ML². Substituting the values, I becomes I=1/12 (16 kg)(4 m)². The confusion arises from the interpretation of the center of mass; the entire length of the rod should be used for mass calculation, not half. Therefore, the correct approach confirms that M should be 16 kg for accurate moment of inertia calculation.
Alem2000
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I had a problem with finding the moment of inertia. I have a rod and it has linear density\lambda=4.0kg and the equation for its moment of inertia is I=\frac{1}{12} ML^2 now I have an axis at the center of mass of a rod the rod has a total length L=4m so in my equation I would have to substute \lambda L=M now the thing that I don't understand is if my center of mass horizontal cordinate is 2m the length I multipy by lambda should be 2m correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kg is not the unit for linear density. I'm assuming you meant 4.0\frac{kg}{m}. If each meter of the rod has a mass of 4.0kg, why would you only multiply by half the length of the rod to get its mass? I think M=(4.0\frac{kg}{m})(4.0m). Does that give you the right answer?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
708
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
952
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top