Understanding Charge Distribution in Touched Metal Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter thursdaytbs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
AI Thread Summary
Three identical metal spheres, A, B, and C, undergo a series of charge interactions resulting in specific charge distributions. Initially, sphere A has +5q, sphere B has -q, and sphere C has 0q. After touching A and B, they equalize to +2q each, followed by sphere C touching A and then B, leading to C ending up with +1.5q. The total charge on the three spheres remains conserved at +4q before and after the interactions. Understanding the charge distribution relies on the principle that conductors in contact must reach the same electric potential.
thursdaytbs
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
The question goes as follows:

Consider three identical metal spheres, A, B, and C. Sphere A carries a charge of +5q. Sphere B carries a charge of -q. Sphere C carries no net charge. Spheres A and B are touched together and then seperated. Sphere C is then touched to sphere A and separated from it. Lastly, sphere C is touched to sphere B and separated from it. (a) How much charge ends up on sphere C? What is the total charge on the three spheres (b) before they are allowed to touch each other and (c) after they have touched?

The correct answers are:
(a) +1.5q
(b) +4q
(c) +4q

Although, my logic doesn't seem to give me these answers, I was wondering if anyone can explain why and how to approach this problem.

My logic goes as follows:
Sphere A = +5q
Sphere B = -q
Sphere C = 0

"Spheres A and B are touched together and then seperated. " Resulting in Sphere A = +4q, Sphere B = 0, Sphere C = 0

"Sphere C is then touched to sphere A and separated from it." Resulting in Sphere A = 0, Sphere B = 0, Sphere C = +4q

"Lastly, sphere C is touched to sphere B and separated from it." Resulting in Sphere A = 0, Sphere B = +4q, Sphere C = 0

Anyway, we just began this chapter and my understanding of it is extremely minimal so that's why I'm probablly going about it extremely wrong. Just wondering if anyone could help me out and explain how it works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: Since the spheres are conductors then two spheres that have been brought into contact with each other must be at the same potential.
 
Thanks for the response.
Ohh okay, so after

A and B are touched, it becomes: A=+2q, B=+2q, C=0q
then C and A touch, becoming: A=+1q, B=+2q, C=+1q
then C and B touch, resulting: A=+1q, B=+1.5q, C=+1.5q

Is that how it should be done?
 
The answers to question b) and c) are simple to get as the total charge must conserve.However,your reasoning for the first question is defectuos.
A-B:A intially +4q,B initially -q.Think of it in terms of particles with positive charge and negative charge (electrons and postirons).On A there are 4 particles with positive charge and on B there is one particle with negative charge.When these 2 are put into contact,there is a flow of the particles.Let's assume the positive particles start to move.Leaves the first and annihilates with the negative particle already on B.Now on B the charge is 0.The system still isn't in equilibrium.Leaves the second.On B the charge is zero,therefore it will go there very easily.The second one goes there as well.It will equilibrium when the 2 spheres will have the same charge.Namely +2q.The charge flow will happen as long as there is nonequlilibrium in the charge quantity.So,when the 2 charged bodies enter into contact,the electric current will tend to restablish the equilibrium.

Consider the same logics for the other 2 interactions and u'll end up with 1.5q on both C and B.

Daniel.

PS.I'm sorry,i'm used to explining this in much more complicated terms.That's why i seemed to be a little sluggish. :redface:
 
thursdaytbs,

Way to go!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top