Prove square of four-momentum is relativistic invariant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the square of the relativistic four-momentum for a massive particle is invariant under Lorentz transformations. The user expresses confusion regarding the concept of relativistic invariance and seeks assistance with their homework. They provide an example using four-momentum from two different observers, concluding that both yield the same invariant result of (mc)^2. Another participant confirms the user's approach as both elegant and correct, suggesting a method involving Lorentz transformations to derive the result explicitly. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how different inertial frames agree on invariant quantities.
Falken_47
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone,

I have a physics assignment that asks: Prove that the square of relativistic four-momentum for a massive particle is a relativistic invariant under Lorentz transformations.

Can anyone help me to work on the problem? I'm always lost in the class ever since my professor starts teaching modern physics. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Homework Equations



p = <γmc, γmv>

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I can gather from the question and my understanding, relativistic invariant means that the four-momentum from two different observer should be the same. My best shot on this question is through example from my class notes:

suppose p1 (four-momentum from observer 1) is <γmc, γmv> and p2 four-momentum from observer 2, traveling at speed v) is <mc, 0>. Therefore when we calculate p^2 for both observer we find it to be (mc)^2

Again I'm really grateful for any help you could give me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Falken_47. If you want to derive it explicitly, take the square of the 4-momentum p^i=({\gamma}mc,{\gamma}m{\mathbf{v}}), apply the Lorentz transformations for a contravariant 4-vector to obtain p^i{&#039;} which moves in a frame at an arbitrary speed V with respect to the original frame. So you should have p^i{&#039;} in terms of non-primes, take the square of this and after some algebra you should arrive at the same solution as you had for the square of p^i. Lorentz Invariant just means that 2 observers in 2 different inertial frames will agree on the quantity which is invariant.
 
Falken_47 said:

Homework Statement



Hi everyone,

I have a physics assignment that asks: Prove that the square of relativistic four-momentum for a massive particle is a relativistic invariant under Lorentz transformations.

Can anyone help me to work on the problem? I'm always lost in the class ever since my professor starts teaching modern physics. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Homework Equations



p = <γmc, γmv>

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I can gather from the question and my understanding, relativistic invariant means that the four-momentum from two different observer should be the same. My best shot on this question is through example from my class notes:

suppose p1 (four-momentum from observer 1) is <γmc, γmv> and p2 four-momentum from observer 2, traveling at speed v) is <mc, 0>. Therefore when we calculate p^2 for both observer we find it to be (mc)^2

Again I'm really grateful for any help you could give me

I think that your method is both elegant and correct.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top