Doppler Effect aturla frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Doppler Effect, specifically comparing classical and relativistic shifts. Participants explore the equations for frequency observed when the source moves towards a stationary observer, emphasizing the conditions where the speeds of the source and observer are much less than the wave speed. They discuss the need for a deeper relationship between the speeds involved, rather than merely stating they are non-zero. Additionally, there is a request for guidance on expanding the relativistic Doppler shift formula using binomial expansion techniques. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical relationships to accurately derive the differences between classical and relativistic effects.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
In class we were explained that if the source moves toward the stationary observer

f' = f_{0} \frac{v}{v-v_{s}}
where f0 is then aturla frequency of the wave, v is hte speed of the wave, and vs is the speed of the source

and f' = f_{0} \frac{v_{rel}+v}{v}
where vrel is the speed of the observer

a)SHow that the result are thesame if the source and observer speed are much less than the wave speed

Now i can easilky say that v - v_{s} \neq 0 and similarly v_{rel} + v \neq 0 but is that really enough??

It is worth 5 marks in thsi assignment

b) FInd the difference between theclassical Doppler shift and the relativitistic Dopper shift up to the second order terms in (v/c)^2

now i know the relativistic expression is

f' = f_{0} \sqrt{\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}}

but how do i expand this. I do know how to expand \frac{1}{1-x}
but in this case i can get v / v-c and c/v-c how would that work??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
In class we were explained that if the source moves toward the stationary observer

f' = f_{0} \frac{v}{v-v_{s}}
where f0 is then aturla frequency of the wave, v is hte speed of the wave, and vs is the speed of the source

and f' = f_{0} \frac{v_{rel}+v}{v}
where vrel is the speed of the observer

a)SHow that the result are thesame if the source and observer speed are much less than the wave speed

Now i can easilky say that v - v_{s} \neq 0 and similarly v_{rel} + v \neq 0 but is that really enough??

From your question it seems like you are trying to pove:
f' = f_{0} \frac{v}{v-v_{s}} =f_{0} \frac{v_{rel}+v}{v}
\frac{1}{1-x} = 1 + x \ \ {When\ x\ll1}
so we have
f' = f_{0} \frac{v}{v-v_{s}} = f_{0} \frac{1}{1-\frac{v_{s}}{v}} \cong f_{0} ( 1 + \frac{v_{s}}{v} ) = f_{0} \frac{v_{rel}+v}{v} =f_{0} (\frac{v_{rel}}{v}+1)
Since v_{s} = v_{rel}

stunner5000pt said:
b) FInd the difference between theclassical Doppler shift and the relativitistic Dopper shift up to the second order terms in (v/c)^2

now i know the relativistic expression is

f' = f_{0} \sqrt{\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}}

but how do i expand this. I do know how to expand \frac{1}{1-x}
but in this case i can get v / v-c and c/v-c how would that work??

hmm I would use the binomial Expansion. I am lazy and did not want to write out the binomial Expansion so here is a link:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/alg3.html
 
a)No...U should try to put the expressions in a way in which u can take the relevant limit v<<v_{s}

b)Use this trick:
\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}=1+\frac{2\beta}{1-\beta}=1+\frac{1}{something}

and now to take out terms in \beta^{2} outta the square root...

Daniel.
 
stunner5000pt said:
In class we were explained that if the source moves toward the stationary observer

f' = f_{0} \frac{v}{v-v_{s}}
where f0 is then aturla frequency of the wave, v is hte speed of the wave, and vs is the speed of the source

and f' = f_{0} \frac{v_{rel}+v}{v}
where vrel is the speed of the observer

a)SHow that the result are thesame if the source and observer speed are much less than the wave speed

Now i can easilky say that v - v_{s} \neq 0 and similarly v_{rel} + v \neq 0 but is that really enough??
Wouldn't be enough for me! Saying they are not 0 doesn't say anything about the relationship of v- vs and vr- v. What is the relationship between vs and vr?

b) FInd the difference between theclassical Doppler shift and the relativitistic Dopper shift up to the second order terms in (v/c)^2

now i know the relativistic expression is

f' = f_{0} \sqrt{\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}}

but how do i expand this. I do know how to expand \frac{1}{1-x}
but in this case i can get v / v-c and c/v-c how would that work??

What is β? You should know how to expand \sqrt{1- x^2} in a power series. Once you have expanded it in a power series, replace β by its expression in v and c.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top