Angular momentum operators on matrix form

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the angular momentum operators L_{+} and L_{-} in a three-dimensional subspace defined by the states |1,-1\rangle, |1,0\rangle, and |1,1\rangle. The matrix representation of L_{+} is given as a non-diagonal matrix, indicating that it changes the m values of the states, specifically moving the state |1,-1\rangle to |1,0\rangle and |1,0\rangle to |1,1\rangle, while leaving |1,1\rangle unaffected. The factor of \sqrt{2}\hbar arises from the relationship between the operators and the states. The confusion stems from the expectation that the matrix should be diagonal, but the non-diagonal form reflects the action of the raising operator. This discussion clarifies the conceptual understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi.

I'm given a 3-dimensional subspace H that is made up of the states |1,-1\rangle, |1,0\rangle and |1,1\rangle with the states defined as |l,m\rangle and l=1 as you can see.

The usual operator relations for L_{z} and L^{2} applies, and also:
L_{+} = L_{x}+iL_{y}
L_{-} = L_{x}-iL_{y}

Then I'm told to express the operators L_{+} and L_{-} in H.

The answer for L_{+} is supposed to be:
{{L}_{+}}=\sqrt{2}\hbar \left[ \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right]<br />
And the transposed for L_{-}

But I'm really not sure how that is found.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The \sqrt{2}\hbar probably comes from the fact that:
{{L}_{\pm }}\left| l,m \right\rangle =\sqrt{l\left( l+1 \right)-m\left( m\pm 1 \right)}\hbar \left| l,m \right\rangle

But I can't figure out why the entries in the matrix is like that.
My first thought was that it should be diagonal, as it was made up of the 3 bases, but as you can see, it is not diagonal.So I was hoping someone could explain what I'm missing out ?Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denver Dang said:
The \sqrt{2}\hbar probably comes from the fact that:
{{L}_{\pm }}\left| l,m \right\rangle =\sqrt{l\left( l+1 \right)-m\left( m\pm 1 \right)}\hbar \left| l,m \right\rangle

I don't think that is right; it should change the value of m, and also m may not be greater than \ell.

Denver Dang said:
The answer for L_{+} is supposed to be:
{{L}_{+}}=\sqrt{2}\hbar \left[ \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right]

This acts on column vector that has the first row for m = -1, the second row for m =0, and the third row for m= 1.

The first row of the matrix is all zero because no matter what, when L_{+} acts on a state, there is never anything remaining in the m = -1 position. The second row takes whatever was in the m = -1 position and moves it to the m=0 position (multiplied by a constant). The third row of the the matrix takes whatever is in the m=0 and moves it to m =1 position, multiplied by a constant.

This was a conceptual question and not a homework exercise, right?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top