What is the difference between these two formula of ripple voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two formulas for calculating peak-to-peak ripple voltage: Vripple p-p = I / 2fC and Vripple p-p = Vrect / fRLC. The first formula is commonly used, while the second appears less frequently in sources. Both formulas are approximations and relate to the load resistance, with the ripple voltage decreasing as resistance increases. The factor of 1/2 in the first formula accounts for the peak-to-peak nature of the voltage waveform, especially in full-wave rectifier circuits where the capacitor charges every half cycle. Ultimately, both equations serve to estimate ripple voltage under different conditions.
null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
I found 2 equation for calculating the peak to peak ripple voltage,

this one is the common one i see,

Vripple p-p = I / 2fCAnd i also see this one in my book, but can't really find any other source use this formula,

Vripple p-p = Vrect / fRLC

Vrect is the peak voltage of unfiltered voltage
f is frequency,
C is capacitance
RL is the load voltageWhat is the difference between these two formula? Are they really for counting the same parameter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
null void said:
I found 2 equation for calculating the peak to peak ripple voltage,

this one is the common one i see,

Vripple p-p = I / 2fC


And i also see this one in my book, but can't really find any other source use this formula,

Vripple p-p = Vrect / fRLC

Vrect is the peak voltage of unfiltered voltage
f is frequency,
C is capacitance
RL is the load voltage


What is the difference between these two formula? Are they really for counting the same parameter?

That's Resistance, I think.
The ripple is very much dependent upon the load resistance. If the load has infinite resistance then there will be no ripple at all because the capacitor will hold its charge from one positive supply peak to the next. The smaller the R, the faster the C will discharge and the time constant will be RC. The "I" in the first formula is a result of I = V/R, so both formulae are equivalent. They are approximations.
See this link, as an example.

The two formulae assume that the source resistance is low enough to ignore; the volts on the C at each peak need to 'follow the nominal sinusoidal input wave' for the simple approximation. If you use a cheapo transformer and over-load it, the output volts will never reach the open circuit maximum value. The volts can 'sag' because of the potential divider effect of the source and load resistances and you'll get less ripple and less DC.
 
from the second equation,

Vripple p-p = Vrect / fRLC

= Vrect / fC x I/Vrect

= I / fC

but the first equation has 1/2
 
I think the 1/2 factor must come from the peak to peak of the Voltage waveform and the average value of current (due to the average voltage). They are both approximations, in any case.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Get it, thanks
 
the 1/2 factor comes from the type of rectifer used in the circuit.
For a full wave or bridge rectifier the capacitor charges every half cycle of the waveform, so the ripple frequency is 2f.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top