How Much is the Rope Extended When the Circus Performer Hangs at Rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punchlinegirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation Rope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the extension of an elastic rope when a 55.0 kg circus performer hangs at rest. Participants analyze the forces acting on the performer and apply Hooke's Law to derive the spring constant (k). There is a consensus that the initial calculation of k, resulting in 0.316, is incorrect, leading to an unrealistic extension of 1705 m. Suggestions are made to estimate k's value based on the relationship between the period of oscillation and mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring k is appropriately scaled relative to the mass for accurate results.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
A 55.0 kg circus performer oscillates up and down at the end of a long elastic rope at a rate of once every 8.40 s. The elastic rope obeys Hooke's Law. By how much is the rope extended beyond its unloaded length when the performer hangs at rest?

I drew a free body diagram and summed up the forced to get:
F_{t} - mg= 0
Since F_{t}= -kx , I substituted it in.
Using the equation t= 2\pi\sqrt{m/k}, I solved for k and got .316. I plugged this into the equation and got x=1705 m, which isn't right... can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Punchlinegirl said:
Using the equation t= 2\pi\sqrt{m/k}, I solved for k and got .316.
That equation is OK, but your answer for k is not. Redo it.
 
Punchlinegirl said:
A 55.0 kg circus performer oscillates up and down at the end of a long elastic rope at a rate of once every 8.40 s. The elastic rope obeys Hooke's Law. By how much is the rope extended beyond its unloaded length when the performer hangs at rest?

I drew a free body diagram and summed up the forced to get:
F_{t} - mg= 0
Since F_{t}= -kx , I substituted it in.
Using the equation t= 2\pi\sqrt{m/k}, I solved for k and got .316. I plugged this into the equation and got x=1705 m, which isn't right... can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

Do an estimate to see if your k value is reasonable

T/2\pi = \sqrt{m/k}

must be about 8.4/6 which is about 1.4

How must the numerical value of k compare to the numerical value of m?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top