Acceleration and Rotational Kinetic Energy in a Rigidly Mounted Cylinder System

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a rigidly mounted cylinder system where a larger cylinder and a smaller cylinder are connected to a shaft, with identical masses hung from cords wound around them. The cylinders turn clockwise due to the greater torque exerted by the mass on the larger cylinder. For the acceleration of the mass on the larger cylinder, the user derived an angular acceleration equation but is unsure if it accounts for all necessary factors, particularly the influence of the mass on the smaller cylinder. They mention that solving the problem requires multiple equations to find all unknowns. The user invites others to share their detailed solutions if interested.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
A cylinder of mass m and radius R is rigidly mounted to the same shaft as a lightweight cylinder of radius R/2. The shaft is free to turn with negligible friction. Cords are wound in opposite directions about the cylinders, and identical masses m are hung from the cords. a) Which way do the cylinders turn? (clockwise) b) what is the acceleration of the mass hung on the cylinder of radius R?

The actual problem comes with a picture that has a cord coming off the right side of the big disk and a cord coming off the left side of the small disk. I know the assembly spins clockwise because the mass on the big cylinder has more torque than the one on the small cylinder.

Part B I'm not so sure about. Basically I equated the tension in the wire to the tangental force from the pulley, and wrote the torque equation: \tau = R F. From there I went to R F = I\alpha = \frac{1}{2} mR^2\alpha and solved for \alpha. The final result was \alpha = \frac{2F}{mR}. My only question is did I do it right and if not what other factors do I need to include?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I probably need to account for the other weight on the little cylinder right?
 
The problem was solved by two of my friends in half a page. It is basically solving 5 equations in 5 unknowns. If anyone is interested in seeing the exact steps, please reply to this post.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top