2 boxes stacked, determining forces on each other.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathwhiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical forces acting on two stacked blocks, with specific masses and coefficients of friction provided. The upper block weighs 0.85 kg, resulting in a gravitational force of 8.33 N, while the lower block weighs 1.67 kg. The user initially struggles with the free body diagram and the application of Newton's First Law, leading to confusion about the contact force between the blocks. After reevaluating the problem, they realize they were overthinking it and successfully find the correct answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying forces in free body diagrams to solve physics problems effectively.
mathwhiz
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The mass of the upper block in the stack is 0.85 kg. The mass of the lower block in the stack is 1.67 kg. The coefficients of friction between the two blocks are: static 0.75, and kinetic 0.61. The child's mother, who likes to encourage his experiments, has oiled a small strip of the horizontal floor so that it is very slick; the coefficient of kinetic friction between the oiled section of floor and the lower block is only 0.12 and the coefficient of static friction is insignificantly different.

Before the pushing starts, here are some questions about the vertical forces acting on the two blocks.

b) What is the vertical component of the contact force on the upper block by the lower block? HINT: You must apply Newton's First Law.

Homework Equations



ƩF=0
Since at this point in time the boxes are stationary

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the Fg of upper box is 8.33N, I also know that along with the normal force on the upper block there is also a FB2B1 block 2 being the upper block.
I believe Fg,total= 24.696N, after many other attempts I tried to say Fg,total = NB2, therefore
ƩF = n + FB2B1 - Fg,B2
= 24.696N + FB2B1 - 8.33N = 0
this gives me a negative result for FB2B1 which I know is incorrect.
Here are my free body diagrams, I believe I may be missing something in my FBD which is why I cannot get the answer I am looking for.
 

Attachments

  • photo-3.JPG
    photo-3.JPG
    11.4 KB · Views: 1,187
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at the upper block, where do each of the forces come from?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I ended up getting the answer, I was over-thinking the problem as I do sometimes, especially when it's late. Thank You for your reply
 
Well done. Would you like to provide the actual method for the benefit of others?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top