2-Way Interaction between Rotation and Translation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the interaction between rotation and translation in circular motion, particularly in the context of rolling objects like tires. It highlights that both position (X) and rotation (theta) are independent properties that interact through friction, which helps achieve equilibrium when their velocities match. The predictions state that if the rotational velocity exceeds the translational velocity, slipping occurs, while the opposite leads to sliding. The conversation references existing resources that primarily address pure rolling conditions but expresses a need for a model that encompasses more complex interactions. Ultimately, the search for a comprehensive method to describe these dynamics remains unresolved.
Sobeita
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I've seen dozens of examples of well-made games and demonstrations that seem to handle this concept perfectly well, and yet I can't find a documented method to approaching it. Basically, a tire on an incline will begin to roll rather than slide down the slope, but a spinning tire dropped on a level surface will be inclined to move in the direction it's spinning. Slippery surfaces and bald tires make both transitions slower, hence slipping, spinning out, skidding, etc. I've established these general rules with a thought experiment:

1. The two basic properties of the circle are X and theta (position and rotation). They can both be derived over time to form velocity, acceleration, and so on. Both are completely independent properties, but there is interaction due to other conditions in the system (see below.)

2. The circle will seek a state of equilibrium in which V of theta and V of x are equal. Equilibrium is achieved through (some function of) friction between the circle and the plane.
(Corollary: all forms of friction can help the circle achieve equilibrium, including air friction. A baseball, for instance, curves as its rotational velocity affects its trajectory.)

Predictions of interaction:
a) If V of theta exceeds V of x, the circle will slip as it spins faster than it moves until velocities level.
b) If V of x exceeds V of theta, the circle will slide as it moves faster than it spins until velocities level.
c) If V of x and V of theta are different across the origin, the circle will move in the direction of V of x but spin in the direction of V of theta - thus achieving Slip 'n' Slide.
(If V of theta equals V of x, the circle is in "pure roll".)

So, what model does the interaction follow? I am almost certain there's a simple method. Just look at Fantastic Contraption for example.

I was able to find this page: http://cnx.org/content/m14312/latest/
...however, it only handles pure roll conditions. I even found some eighth-year college videos - http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/VideoLectures/index.htm - which were really, really high quality, but still never left pure roll. There were some mind-boggling gyroscope demos, but nothing to help my little problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
interesting premise,,, but like, tops spin with mostly angular velocity, and a little precession... so angular energy is larger than translational moving energy... until the top falls once drag slows it down enough ?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top