Transformer Voltage vs. Frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between voltage and frequency in a transformer setup using solenoids on a ferromagnetic core. The user seeks clarification on the linear pattern observed in their voltage vs. frequency graph and questions the relevance of the equation V=4.44f compared to the transformer turns ratio equation V1/N1=V2/N2. It is noted that the voltage drop is influenced by hysteresis, which becomes more significant at higher frequencies. The conversation includes a breakdown of the sinusoidal voltage and current relationships, as well as Lenz's Law for induced voltage in the secondary coil. The user is encouraged to explore the hysteresis curve to better understand the frequency-voltage relationship.
sus4nx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using two solenoids on a ferromagnetic core, I made a primitive transformer and graphed this graph of voltage against frequency which is attached.


Homework Equations



[What I'm looking for.]

The Attempt at a Solution




What I am having trouble is, what equation describes the linear pattern in the earlier part of the curve? There's one on wikipedia, V=4.44f, but why doesn't this relate to V1/N1=V2/N2, eqn for transformer in an alternating current?

And I know that the voltage drops off because of hysteresis which is inversely proportional to voltage, and that the delaying effects of hysteresis become more and more significant to the shortening period as frequency increases. What function do I need to model this behaviour?

I would be really glad if anyone would help, because the lab's due Monday.
 

Attachments

  • voltvsfreq.jpg
    voltvsfreq.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 1,034
Physics news on Phys.org
For the transformer equation, youre right, the turns ratio equation does hold. The 4.44f... equation is an approximation.

If you assume the voltage across the primary is purely sinusoidal and no harmonics are present,

V_p=V_{max}sin\omega t

This causes a current

I_p=I_{max}sin(\omega t+\theta) where the phase difference exists because of the inductance of the primary coil.

This current creates a magnetic flux

\phi _p=\phi _{max} sin(\omega t+ \theta) which is in phase with the current.

Now, the voltage induced in the secondary is given by Lenz's Law:

E_s=-n\frac{d\phi}{dt} where n is the number of turns of the secondary

This gives E_s=n\phi _{max}\omega sin(\omega t+\theta)

\omega =2\pi f

This secondary induced voltage is approximated by E_s=4.44nf\phi

As for the hysteresis problem, I'm sure you could find the equation of the hysteresis curve online. From there you know the limiting value of magnetic flux. Using that and the above discussion you could find the relation between frequency and voltage.

Hope that helps.

Chaos
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top