Gremlin said:
Once you have the impedance how do you go about splitting them into L & R? And the same with splitting Y2 into G & C? You say it's obvious, which slightly unnerves me as it isn't obvious to me at the moment.
Z1 = 0.5 (R +jωL) x length of line.
Z1 = 26.26 + j96.52
f = 50
l = 50km
26.26 + j96.52 = 0.5 (R + j 2*pi*50 L) * 50
Not sure from that a) how you can isolate R or L and b) whether it should be 50km or 50000m
Similarly
Y2 = (G + jωC) x length of line.
Z1 = R + jwL = Z3
Y2 = G + jwC
Each impedance/admittance has a real and an imaginary part. The relationship with R,L,C and G should be obvious once you've computed Z1, Z3 and Y2 in terms of A,B,C and D.
BTW don't mix up C of the ABCD's with the line capacitance C.
The length of the line is implied in the ABCD parameters. You should have Z1, Z3 and Y2 strictly in terms of the complex ABCD parameters. You have that relationship given to you, albeit indirectly (cf. your post 1, section 2)..
Remember f = 50 Hz.
Hint: since the line is unterminated, does Z3 matter at all? You can make life much simpler by deleting Z3. Your V
R voltage is then measured at the mid-point of the original T-equivalent network.
One thing: they ask for R,L.G and C. Usually, these parameters are
per unit length of line. Since they don't give you the length of the line you have to assume R,L,C and G are for the WHOLE line. That is unusual and misleading IMO.
Gremlin said:
Thanks rude man,
Just so we don't get our wires crossed here I've already completed part a) and my posts #12 & #13 relate to part b) - don't your posts #9 & #11 relate to part a)?
Yes. Post 14 and this one are the only ones addressing part (b).