Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: A difficult substitution & separable integral

  1. Apr 1, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I'm not sure how to proceed here. The first one asks me to find the area of a surface obtained by rotating the curve [tex]y = cos(x), 0 \leq x \leq\ \frac{\pi}{3}[/tex]

    The second one asks to Solve: [tex]\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{ty+3t}{t^2+1}\ y(2)=2[/tex]

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    http://www.mcp-server.com/~lush/shillmud/int3.4.JPG
    I've tried a bunch of different substitutions but I always stall on the integration.

    http://www.mcp-server.com/~lush/shillmud/int3.7.JPG
    I'm not sure how to satisfy the condition y(2) = 2. Thank you again for your help.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 1, 2008 #2
    For the first question, integrate (secx)^3 by parts with u = secx and dv = (secx)^2.

    For the second question, remember, there's a + C.
     
  4. Apr 2, 2008 #3
    Thanks for the reply.

    Alright so if I inetgrate the first one fully from sec^3 I get:

    [tex]\int^\frac{\pi}{3}_{0}(sec^3\ x\ dx) = sec\ x\ tan x - \int(sec\ x\ tan^2\ x dx)[/tex]
    [tex]= sec\ x\ tan\ x - \int(sec\ x\ (sec^2\ x - 1) dx)[/tex]
    [tex]= sec\ x\ tan\ x - \int(sec^3\ x\ dx) + \int(sec\ x\ dx)[/tex]
    [tex]= sec\ x\ tan\ x - \int(sec^3\ x\ dx) + ln(sec\ x + tan\ x) + C[/tex]
    [tex]\int(sec^3\ x\ dx) = 1/2(sec\ x\ tan\ x + ln(sec\ x + tan\ x)) + C[/tex]

    But as you can see in my orginal post I have been a substitution. I believe I must return to the original term. However, I do not see in opportunity to do so during the integration above.

    As for the second question, how does C change anything there? Cheers.
     
  5. Apr 3, 2008 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Why did you change from a definite integral to an indefinite integral?

    The way you have this written, yes, you should go back to your original variable, x, and evaluate at 0 and [itex]\pi/3[/itex]. The "C" will cancel and means nothing in a definite integral.

    It's usually simpler to change the limits of integration as you substitute.

    In what you wrote originally you make the substution u= -sin(x) but still has 0 and [itex]\pi/3[/itex] as your limits of integration. That's incorrect. When x= 0, u= 0 so the lower limit is still 0 but when x= [itex]\pi/3[/itex], u= sin([itex]\pi/3[/itex])= [itex]\sqrt{3}/2[/itex].
     
  6. Apr 4, 2008 #5
    Right, but do I have to change the limits of integration again for the 2nd sub to tan & sec^2... seems like I have done this one the hard way.
     
  7. Apr 4, 2008 #6
    [tex]\int\sec^3 xdx=\mbox{the average of the derivative and integral of secant}[/tex]
     
  8. Apr 4, 2008 #7
    i have a doubt here. When we say that a curve is rotated, like on rotation of y = cos(x), as in this question.. which axis are we rotating it along?

    I could rotate it along the x-axis, the y-axis or an axis that is perpendicular to the y-axis and passes through (0, Cos[pi/3]).
     
  9. Apr 4, 2008 #8
    Ok, so is that a yes or no to the "do I need to change the limits of integration a second time" question:P Thanks for your patience folks. It's a rotation about the x-axis.
     
  10. Apr 4, 2008 #9
    No, because you didn't substitute anything. You used integration by parts. Everything is in terms of x, not u or v.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2008
  11. Apr 4, 2008 #10
    Sorry, I've made this really confusing (for myself as well). When i put the integration of sec^3 in latex i used x but if you look to the top it should actually be an integration of sec^3 theta which is the result of a substitution of -sin x for tan theta.
     
  12. Apr 5, 2008 #11
    bump (save me from these numbers and symbols)
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook