A doubt in angular momentum problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving two non-coaxial disks, where one disk is stationary and the other is rotating. The main question is about determining the final angular velocity of both disks after the stationary disk stops the rotating one. It is clarified that the final angular velocity will be zero since both disks become stationary. Participants explore the concept of angular momentum, emphasizing the need to calculate the angular momentum of the smaller disk with respect to the larger disk's axis. The conversation highlights the complexity of representing angular momentum when dealing with different axes of rotation.
basheer uddin
Messages
30
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


if a disk is rotating on another stationary disk and someone standing on the stationary disk stops it what will the final angular velocity of both the disks be?
the catch is that both the disks are not co axial. assume ω angular velocity, M mass of big disk.m mass of small disk.R radius of larger disk,R/2 radius of small disk.I1=moment of inertia of big disk with respect to axis 1,I2=moment of inertia of small disk with respect to axis 2
Untitled1.png

Homework Equations


conservation of angular momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



what is the angular momentum of the small disk with respect to the axis of the larger disk?
its definitely not I2ω since it would be angular momentum about axis 2.please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question as stated has a totally trivial answer. Since the question asks what is the final angular velocity of both disks after they are both stationary the answer is zero.
 
basheer uddin said:
what is the angular momentum of the small disk with respect to the axis of the larger disk?
its definitely not I2ω since it would be angular momentum about axis 2.
Why do you think it cannot be the same?
You can represent a rotation about one axis as the sum of a linear motion and a rotation about another axis. Try doing that to express the smaller disk's rotation about axis 1.
 
so you mean total angular momentum of small disk about axis 1 is the sum of angular momentum of the disk about axis 2(here, assuming it doesn't rotate about axis 1) and the angular momentum of the small disk about axis1 (here, assuming it doesn't rotate about axis 2)?
 
basheer uddin said:
so you mean total angular momentum of small disk about axis 1 is the sum of angular momentum of the disk about axis 2(here, assuming it doesn't rotate about axis 1) and the angular momentum of the small disk about axis1 (here, assuming it doesn't rotate about axis 2)?
That can't be right - the first and third items in that list are the same: "the angular momentum of the small disk about axis1."
I'm saying that the small disk's rotation about its own axis can be rewritten (as an instantaneous description) as a rotation about axis 1 plus a linear motion. This only applies as a snapshot, but it gives you a way to handle what happens when the small disk is locked to the large disk.
Can you see how to do the rewrite? The angular velocity will be the same, and the linear velocity will be whatever is needed to make the centre of disk 1 instantaneously stationary.
 
  • Like
Likes basheer uddin
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top