Your thread will remain closed. We do not allow challenges to mainstream science here. We do allow sincere questions about basic E&M, with the intent being understanding E&M better. Please PM me if you want to continue this discussion. It is too big of a potential waste of time to leave as a general discussion item. Thank you.Narayanan KR said:
A motor design that defies Lenz' law is able to produce motion without creating a counter electromotive force (EMF) in the opposite direction of the applied voltage. This is achieved by using specialized materials and circuitry to minimize the effects of Lenz' law.
Lenz' law states that when an EMF is induced in a conductor, it creates a magnetic field that opposes the change in the magnetic field that caused the induction. In motor design, this means that when a current is applied to a coil, it will create a magnetic field that resists the motion of the motor. This can limit the efficiency and performance of the motor.
Some examples of motor designs that defy Lenz' law include axial flux motors, switched reluctance motors, and permanent magnet synchronous motors. These designs use different methods such as minimizing magnetic flux leakage or using permanent magnets to reduce the effects of Lenz' law.
Using a motor design that defies Lenz' law can result in increased efficiency and performance of the motor. This is because it reduces the energy losses caused by the counter EMF and allows for smoother and more precise control of the motor's speed and torque.
One potential disadvantage of using a motor design that defies Lenz' law is that it may require more complex and expensive materials and circuitry. Additionally, these designs may not be suitable for all applications and may have specific operating conditions or limitations.