A particle moving under a conservative force

jamie.j1989
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From, Classical mechanics 5th edition, Tom W.B. Kibble, Frank H. Berkshire
Chapter 2, problem 30

A particle moving under a conservative force oscillates between x11 and x2. Show that the period of oscillation is

τ = 2\int^{x_{2}}_{x^{1}}\sqrt{\frac{m}{2(V(x_{2})-V(x))}}dx

Homework Equations



m\ddot{x} + F(x) = 0

F(x) = -\frac{d}{dx}V(x)


The Attempt at a Solution



m\ddot{x} + F(x) = 0

→ m\ddot{x} -\frac{d}{dx}V(x) = 0

→ \int^{x_{2}}_{x_{1}}m\ddot{x}dx = V(x2)-V(x1)

Im not sure if I've started right and if I have I don't know how to go forward with the \ddot{x}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rewrite $$m\ddot{x} + \frac{dV}{dx} = 0 \,\,\text{as}\,\,\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + V(x)\right) = 0$$ and carry on from there.
 
When I try that I just end up with

m\int\dot{x}\frac{d\dot{x}}{dx}dx + V(x) = 0

by parts on the integral just sends me in a circle?
 
If $$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{2}m\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + V(x) \right) = 0\,\,\,\text{then}\,\,\,\frac{1}{2}m\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + V(x) = \text{const}$$ Use what you know about the particle at the boundaries of its oscillations (i.e at ##x_1## and ##x_2##) to obtain the constant.

Once you have this, you can separate variables to find T.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top