A Proton is Accelerated Through What Voltage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chunkytuna21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To determine the voltage needed to accelerate a proton to a speed of 8.2*10^4 m/s towards a charged sphere, the calculations involve both the electric potential due to the sphere and the kinetic energy of the proton. The voltage from the sphere was calculated to be approximately 59.93V, while the change in voltage needed for the proton's kinetic energy was found to be 35.09V. Adding these values gives a total of 95V, but the expected answer differs. The confusion arises from the application of the kinetic energy equation, indicating a misunderstanding of the principles behind the calculations. Clarification on the underlying physics principles is needed to resolve the discrepancy.
chunkytuna21
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
A metal target sphere of 30 cm diameter suspended out in space is given a charge of +1.00 nC. Through what voltage must a distant proton be accelerated from rest (by some sort of space weapon) if it is to arrive at the sphere at a speed of 8.2*10^4 m/s? (Neglect any gravitational effects.)

K0= 8.99*10^9, mass of proton= 1.67*10^-27kg, qe= 1.6*10^-19
V= (K0*Q)/R
1/2mvf^2= qe*delta V

First I calculated V: (8.99*10^9)(1.00*10^-9)/0.15m= 59.93V
Then I calculated Delta V: 1/2(1.67*10^-27)(82000^2)/1.6*10^-19= 35.09V
59.93V+35.09= 95V

Now, this is where I am confused. The answer is not 35V or 59V or even 95V. I really can't see any other way to solve this problem. Where am I going wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chunkytuna21 said:
Where am I going wrong?
Probably right here:
chunkytuna21 said:
1/2mvf^2= qe*delta V
Write the general principle that you're using here.
 
What do you mean? That is the equation for kinetic energy of the proton. I don't know the principle behind it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top