Solve Wave Moving w/ Constant Acceleration: Hi Guys!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psi-String
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
A vertically suspended string with linear density experiences a wave generated from its bottom that moves with constant acceleration. The tension in the string is proportional to the distance from the bottom, leading to a wave speed of v = √(gx), where g is the acceleration due to gravity. As the wave travels upward, its acceleration is determined to be a = g/2, indicating it increases at this rate. The analysis highlights that the wave's behavior changes near the end of the string due to the assumptions of the model breaking down. Overall, the wave's motion is characterized by constant acceleration as it propagates through the string.
Psi-String
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, here's the question.
A string, which has linear density \mu, is suspended vertically. Someone produces a wave from the bottom of the string. Please prove that the wave is moving with constant acceleration

My solution:

let x be the distance between a point on the string and the bottom of the string then

T= \mu x g where T is tension

so

v= \sqrt{ \frac{T}{\mu} } = \sqrt {gx}

then

a= \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dx} \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} g

Am I right or wrong? I'm not sure this really works.
Could someone sovle this problem by other mathematical approach, and tell me why the wave move with constant accleration qualitatively?

Thanks in advanced!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Psi-String said:
Hi guys, here's the question.
A string, which has linear density \mu, is suspended vertically. Someone produces a wave from the bottom of the string. Please prove that the wave is moving with constant acceleration

My solution:

let x be the distance between a point on the string and the bottom of the string then

T= \mu x g where T is tension

so

v= \sqrt{ \frac{T}{\mu} } = \sqrt {gx}

then

a= \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dx} \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} g

Am I right or wrong? I'm not sure this really works.
Could someone sovle this problem by other mathematical approach, and tell me why the wave move with constant accleration qualitatively?
The wave analysis breaks down close to the end since the conditions assumed in the analysis (particularly no resistance to changing shape) no longer apply.

But imagine a long heavy cable hanging with its lower end free. Plucking the cable at the middle sends a pulse that travels up the cable at a speed of v = \sqrt{gx} which increases at the rate of g/2 = 4.9m/sec^2 as it travels up the cable. The pulse traveling down the cable starts at the same speed downward but slows at the rate of g/2.

AM
 
I see. Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top