A question posed in my calculus class

  • Thread starter Thread starter zidion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Class
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of gravity and the myth surrounding dropping a penny from the Empire State Building. It is clarified that the gravitational pull of the building is negligible compared to that of the Earth, meaning a penny would not be drawn towards it. The conversation also touches on the practical challenges of throwing an object from the building's top without it hitting the structure below. Additionally, the material of the object, whether a penny or a metal ball, does not significantly affect its trajectory due to gravity. Overall, the gravitational influence of buildings on falling objects is minimal and does not alter their path.
zidion
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
During my calculus class yesterday we were learning about the simpler way of determining derivatives, but before that we were discussing arcs and parabolas and the such and eventually about if you fired a bullet up from the ground to the top of the empire state building and it had the correct velocity you could catch it easily. And so the topic shifted about the old penny myth about dropping it from the empire state building. My physics teacher says that the penny would not touch the ground because of the gravitational pull of the empire state building would draw it into the side of the building. So this is the question i pose to you all, If one was to drop a penny would it be drawn to the empire state building. Conversely would it be true also with a ball of copper or some metal?
thanks you for your time.:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh surely your teacher is putting you on. The gravitational pull of the empire state building, or any building is so small compared to the Earth's that you wouldn't see any change in the trajectory of a penny. Now the empire state building is "stepped back" at the top. I'm not at all sure you could throw a penny from a window at the top so that it would clear the building lower down, but that has nothing to do with the gravitational pull of the building.

Oh, and we are talking about gravity, not magnetic force. What the object is made of is irrelevant, except that very dense objects will overcome air resistance better than light ones.
 
Interesting idea about catching the bullet though.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top