A simple ladder problem (equilibrium)

  • Thread starter Thread starter NutriGrainKiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a ladder equilibrium problem involving forces and friction as a man climbs a ladder. The user successfully calculated the maximum frictional force but struggled with the subsequent calculations for the actual frictional force and the distance the man can climb before the ladder slips. Key points include the importance of using the correct trigonometric functions for the angles involved and recognizing the ladder forms a 3-4-5 triangle, which simplifies calculations. The correct answers for the frictional force and climbing distance were noted as 171 N and 2.7 m, respectively. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar equilibrium problems effectively.
NutriGrainKiller
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
First test on equilibrium tomorrow, and I'm very sure there is going to be a ladder-type problem on it where I have to determine normal forces, frictional forces when someone is on the ladder up a certain distance, and how far can the person go up before it starts to slip. I don't know if you guys are familiar with masteringphysics.com or not, but it is an online homework system where it automates questions similar to that in the book. I've gotten pretty far in the problem, but for some reason I can't complete the 2nd two problems. Here is the exact problem on mastering physics:
A uniform ladder 5.0 m long rests against a frictionless, vertical wall with its lower end 3.0 m from the wall. The ladder weighs 160 N. The coefficient of static friction between the foot of the ladder and the ground is 0.40. A man weighing 740 N climbs slowly up the ladder.
A)What is the maximum frictional force that the ground can exert on the ladder at its lower end?
B)What is the actual frictional force when the man has climbed 1.0 m along the ladder?
C)How far along the ladder can the man climb before the ladder starts to slip?
I drew a diagram and a free-body diagram of the problem, and was able to get the answer to A through the requirements for equalibrium. Here is my work:
(Fnet)x: Fs-Fw=0
(Fnet)y: Fn-Fp-Fg=0
We have Fp and Fg, so Fn = Fp+Fg or Fn = 900
Since Fs <= Us*Fn we have (Fnet)x: Us*Fn-Fw=0, or Fw=(.4)*(900), so Fw = 360. And since Fs<=Us*Fn, Fs = Fw, so Fsmax=360. This is the answer to A.
I am confused as hell when it comes to B. It is difficult to explain because you cannot see my free-body diagram, but I will do my best to describe it.
Don't know how to use tao, so I'll just use lowercase t.
(tnet)=tn+ts+tp+tg+tw=0. I am choosing the origin to be at the lower end of the ladder where Fn and Fs are, so those would equal zero because they have no moment arm. So here is the new equation:
(tnet): -(Fp)(R)Sin()-(Fg)(R)Sin()+(Fw)(R)Sin()=0. With the values we have
(tnet): -(740n)(1m)sin(53.13)-(160n)(2.5m)sin(53.13)+(Fw)(5m)sin(36.87)=0.
I found 53.13 and 36.87 through basic trig. Here are my questions: I am solving for a new Fw (normal force coming from the wall) in this equation right? i.e. I would NOT be using the value I obtained earlier. After I get that I plug it back into (Fnet)X to get Fs, which would be my answer - right?

My final answer was 301.3, which is NOT right - The correct answer is 171n. Why :confused:

When it comes to part C I'm not sure how to go about it because I don't fully understand the answer to part B. I'm guessing you solve for the unknown moment arm in the tnet equilibrium equation.

Thanks guys

pink floyd says hi :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got your angles the wrong way round!

Or, you should be taking cos instead of sin, and vice versa.

The distance from the bottom of the ladder to the wall is 3 m.
3m is not the height up the wall to the top of the ladder
 
Oh, btw, it's a 3-4-5 triangle, with cos@ = 3/5, sin@ = 4/5. It makes calculations a bit simpler if you recognise that :smile:
 
Thanks Fermat :)

btw for searching purposes the answer to B is 171n and C is 2.7m.
 
Yeah, I got those answers too.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top