Aberration of Light: Understanding Transformation Equations for Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter BareFootKing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aberration Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the transformation equations for coordinates in the context of light aberration. A participant expresses confusion about the presence of a minus R term in the equation for y', questioning its necessity compared to x'. The clarification provided explains that the minus R is essential for adjusting the coordinate system back to the origin at the considered point (0, R). This adjustment is necessary to accurately derive the final equations by squaring y' and x' and summing them. Understanding this transformation is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
BareFootKing
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




http://s22.postimg.org/5vp0p2aox/Untitled.png

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here is the solution

I understand everything that must be done after one find the correct transformations for the two coordinates, but I don't understand why the transformation for y' has a minus R at the end. I would think y' = the first two terms x¬0cos + y¬0sin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is ¬?

The last term comes from the squaring of [highlight]+[/highlight] y0sin(wt) [highlight]-[/highlight] R
 
Sorry, the" ¬" of "y¬0" was not suppose to be there. I was typing my post on word and copied and pasted it to the forum. I meant I thought that y' = xocos(wt) + yosin(wt). Why is there a minus R term for y' and not for x'. I understand if it had the R term and we squared y' and x' and add them up and take the square root we would get the numerator shown in the final answer. But I didn't understand why y' had the minus R term in the begging.
 
Ah, that R.
At the considered point in time, you are at (0,R), so you have to subtract this R to get to the origin again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top