About calculus of variation and lagrangian formulation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculus of variations and the Lagrangian formulation, specifically the principle of least action and its derivation of Newton's second law. The author presents a variation in the path, defined as x(t) → x'(t) = x(t) + a(t), where a(t) is a small perturbation. The transformation of the action integral S into S' involves applying a first-order Taylor series approximation, leading to the expression S' = S + ∫[mẋẏ - aV'(x)] dt, where δS represents the change in action due to the perturbation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, particularly Taylor series expansions
  • Familiarity with the principle of least action
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics, including Newton's laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the principle of least action in classical mechanics
  • Learn about Lagrangian dynamics and its applications in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in calculus of variations
  • Investigate the relationship between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians interested in applied mathematics, and researchers in theoretical mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

physlad
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was reading about the principle of least action and how to derive Newton's second out of it.

at a certain point I didn't follow the calculations,

so the author defines a variation in the path, x(t) \longrightarrow x'(t) = x(t) + a(t), a \ll x

a(t_1) = a(t_2) = 0

Now, S \longrightarrow S' = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} (m/2 (\dot{x} +\dot{a})^2 - V(x +a)) dt

= \int_{t_1}^{t_2} {1/2 m\dot{x}^2 + m\dot{x}\dot{a} - [V(x) + aV'(x)]} dt + O(a^2)

(what happened exactly here? could anybody tell me??)

then

= S + \int_{t_1}^{t_2} [m\dot{x}\dot{a} - aV'(x)] dt

\equiv S + \delta{S}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you meant

<br /> S \longrightarrow S&#039; = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} (m/2 (\dot{x}(t) +\dot{a}(t))^2 - V(x(t) + a(t))) dt<br />

? It looks like they simply used a differential approximation. (i.e. a first-order Taylor series)
 
Yes, I got it. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K