About the Analytical Physics constraint writing.

opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
About the Analytical Physics constraint writing...

I have added a photo about my problem. My problem is why did we write while calculating constraint values as d/2. you will see on the picture what I am saying, I cannot see the reason of writing d/2
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0460.jpg
    IMG_0460.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org


I guess from what I see, that d is the diameter of the disc and \phi is the angle the disc rotated. Then the radius of the disc would be d/2. So the length of the string unwound will be radius times the angle rotated, or \frac{d}{2} \phi.
 


thank you for explaining :)
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top