Abstract Algebra: Extension Fields & Complex nth Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doom of Doom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extension Fields
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on two problems from abstract algebra regarding extension fields and complex nth roots of unity. The first problem questions whether the algebraic closure K of a field F is also the algebraic closure of an intermediate field E, with the conclusion that K is indeed the algebraic closure of E if certain conditions are met. The second problem explores the degree of the field extension \(\left[\mathbb{Q}(\omega) : \mathbb{Q}\right]\) for a complex nth root of unity \(\omega\), concluding that the degree can be expressed as \(\phi\left(\frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\right)\), where \(\phi\) is Euler's totient function, and depends on both n and k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic closures in field theory
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and nth roots of unity
  • Knowledge of field extensions and their degrees
  • Basic understanding of Euler's totient function
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of algebraic closures in field theory
  • Learn about the implications of complex roots of unity in field extensions
  • Research Euler's totient function and its applications in number theory
  • Explore examples of field extensions and their degrees in abstract algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in abstract algebra, mathematicians focusing on field theory, and anyone interested in the properties of algebraic closures and complex roots of unity.

Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Two problems from my abstract algebra class...


1)
Let K be the algebraic closure of a fi eld F and suppose E is a field such that  F F \subseteq E \subseteq K. Then is K the algebraic closure of E?

2)
Let n be a natural number with n\geq2, and suppose that \omega is a complex nth root on unity. Is there a formula for \left[\mathbb{Q}(\omega) : \mathbb{Q}\right] ?


__________________


To 1), I must be missing something really silly, because it seems to me like it is obviously the case that K is also the algebraic closure of E, and that the proof should be easy. But I simply can't think of anything.


To 2) I would say no, but I am not exactly sure that I understand the question. For example, if n=8, then e^{i2\pi/8} is a complex 8th root of unity such that \left[\mathbb{Q}(e^{i2\pi/8}) : \mathbb{Q}\right]=4. However, i is also an 8th root of unity, but \left[\mathbb{Q}(i) : \mathbb{Q}\right]=2. Thus, for a given n, there is not necessarily a formula. Does this sound right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Well for K to be the algebraic closure of E you must show:
a) K/E is algebraic.
b) If g(x) \in E[x], then g(x) splits completely in K. (HINT: Remember that K is an algebraic closure of itself so h(x) \in K[x] imply that h(x) splits completely in K).

2) Well \omega is a specific nth root of unity so it's acceptable for your formula to behave differently when given e^{i2\pi/8} and when given e^{i\pi/8}. You should probably look for a formula of the form:
\left[\mathbb{Q}\left(e^{ik\pi/n}\right) \, : \, \mathbb{Q} \right] = f(n,k)
so the formula can depend on both n and k, not just n.
 
Ok, for 2), I've got the formula

<br /> \left[\mathbb{Q}\left(e^{ik\pi/n}\right) \, : \, \mathbb{Q} \right] = \phi\left(\frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\right)<br />,

where phi is Euler's totient funciton.

Is that right?

Now I just have to prove it...
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K