Acceleration and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between acceleration, kinetic energy, and the dynamics of a charged particle approaching a nucleus. Key equations mentioned include acceleration (a = F/m) and kinetic energy (Ek = 1/2 mv^2). Participants express confusion about determining velocity from kinetic energy and the concept of the point of closest approach, questioning where kinetic energy is maximized. There is a critical discussion on whether the force between two positive charges is attractive or repulsive, impacting the particle's motion. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy transformation and motion in electrostatic interactions.
k0k
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
k30wsi.png



Homework Equations



a=F/m
Ek= 1/2mv^2
---
Not exactly sure how to go through with this..
I tried finding velocity with the given kinetic energy, but am unsure what to do next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What has happened to the kinetic energy at the point of closest approach? Where is the point of closest approach?
 
Um, the kinetic energy is at it's maximum when it's approaching the nuclues?

Wait.. so is the kinetic energy given to me, is the Ek at the beginning I believe. Not sure how that'll help me though.
 
How fast is the particle moving when at its closest to the nucleus? What has been the change in KE? Where has the energy gone? Can you determine the distance of closest approach?
 
k0k said:
Um, the kinetic energy is at it's maximum when it's approaching the nuclues?

Are you sure about that? You have a positive charge approaching another positive charge? Is the force attractive or repulsive?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Using energy considerations to analyse particle motion
Replies
3
Views
833
Confused about a conservation of energy problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Energy of particle in simple harmonic motion
Replies
13
Views
1K
Kinetic Energy of a Cylinder Rolling Without Slipping
Replies
21
Views
4K
Why can we move the spring with constant speed when we apply a force?
Replies
29
Views
2K
Finding kinetic energy and initial velocity of a cart over time
Replies
6
Views
2K
Deriving a formula for Kinetic Energy
Replies
3
Views
1K
Change in the Kinetic Energy of a System
Replies
2
Views
2K
Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Combined Rotation and Translation of a Rectangular Plate
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top