Acceleration due to solar radiation pressure

golfingboy07
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Q: Near the Earth the flux of the EM energy from the sun is ~ 1.4 kW/m2. If an interplanetary sailplane has a sail of mass 1g/m2 and negligible other weight, what would be its acceleration due to solar radiation pressure?

Help! I am a stuck on this. However, I have a few thoughts:

We know that F = ma, since we know the mass and can solve for the Force we can find the acceleration. But, finding the Force is a little tricky. Could we just (maybe) intergrate the stress tensor?? If so, I am a little unsure as to how I would go about doing this

Thanks,

GM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I havn't done anything on this topic at all. But my guess is there must be some formula that you can use that incorperates kw/m2 and g/m2
 
Well, a power is a change in energy per unit time. Maybe try relating the power of the available solar flux to the change in KE of the sailship per unit time. Sailplane? Sailcapsule? Sailwhatever.

Here is a diagram that should help:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060807.html


EDIT -- There may be a factor of 2 buried in the final answer, BTW. I seem to remember that the solar wind is reflected off solar sails to generate the solar thrust. But, I'm not sure about that. What do you get when you try googling this stuff?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top