Acceleration of hollow sphere rolling down table.

AI Thread Summary
A hollow spherical shell rolls down a 35° incline, and its acceleration can be determined using the moment of inertia formula I=2/3mr^2. The relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration is established through a=rw and a=r*alpha. The component of gravitational force acting down the incline is calculated as g sin(35°), while friction prevents slipping, allowing for a net force analysis. The final acceleration is derived as 9.8 sin(35°)/(1+2/3), though clarification on the reasoning behind this formula is sought. Understanding the dynamics and forces involved is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
Bob Loblaw
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow spherical shell is rolling without slipping or sliding down a board that is tilted at an angle of 35.0° with respect to the horizontal. What is its acceleration?


Homework Equations



I=2/3mr^2

if an object rolls without slipping or sliding:

v = rw

that means that

a = r*alpha

right?

The Attempt at a Solution



I imagine the solution would be something times g sin(35) but I am not sure exactly how to go about solving this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make sure the moment of inertia is correct.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sphinc.html


Now the mass has a force pulling it down the incline, which is the weight component parallel to the incline. The moment of inertia is resisting that force, and the friction prevents the sphere from slipping, so friction is acting at the radius in the direction opposite the translational motion parallel with the plane of the incline.

v = rw
a = r*alpha

are correct.
 
Thanks for the help.

I am still a bit murky on this. I know torque=moment of inertia * radial acceleration. I need to find radial acceleration. How can I solve without knowing the torque or the mass of the object? How can I set up the problem in such a way to cancel the mass?
 
I solved it:

9.8sin(35)/(1+2/3)

I am still not sure why it worked out that way. Any kind soul care to help me understand this a little better?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top