Acceleration of two masses on pulley.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of two connected masses on a pulley system, with specific coefficients of friction provided. The user initially derived equations for tension and acceleration but expressed confusion over the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses. A suggestion was made to use conservation of energy for a clearer solution, avoiding the complexities of forces acting on the pulley. The importance of correctly applying static and kinetic friction was highlighted, along with the need to ensure the equations accurately reflect the system's dynamics. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of forces and relationships in such mechanical problems.
ladymiresa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two masses are connected by massless and frictionless pulleys and string. The coefficients of friction are µs = 0.35 and µk = 0.25 between mass m1 and the table. The masses are m1 = 8.0 kg and m2 = 8.0 kg.
EHnDWHJ.png

Find the acceleration of each mass and the tension in the string. (Note: Because of the pulley, if m1 moves a distance L, then m2 moves half that amount, a distance L/2. Think about how this affects the relative acceleration of the two blocks.)

Homework Equations


a1=-1/2a2
fk=ukn=-ukm1g
T-ukm1g=m1a1
T-m2g=m2a2

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the acceleration of block 2 will be negative since it is falling and block 1 will have a positive acceleration since it is moving towards the right.
Ok, I hope I am right in assuming that the accelerations are related as I've written above.
I substituted the a2 into into the first T equation to get T-ukg=-(1/2)m1a2.To cancel the T out, I subtracted the equations to get: (m2-ukm1)g=-1/2 (m2+m1)a2

Then punching in my variables I got a2=-7.35 m/s^2 which I was pleased to see is negative. But then if I use my relationship as a1=-1/2 a2 then I get a1=3.7m/s^2, which is at least positive. But I don't think it makes sense that the acceleration of block 2 would be faster than block 1?

I can't decide where I went wrong? I think it might be my relationship between the two accelerations, but today I asked my professor and she said it looked OK. So now I think I messed something up with the friction... I'm using kinetic but the problem also gave static... do I need to use both? Or does fk not equal ukmg?

I'd appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first three equations look OK. It is not obvious to me how you got your fourth equation, as the tension T on the string is not directly pulling the pulley upwards but rather is going around the pulley. I would expect the upward force on ##m_2## to be either half or double of T, but it could be something else. I doubt that it's T though.

When you subtract the two T equations you get
##(m_2-\mu_km_1)g=-\frac{1}{2}(m_2+m_1)a_2##
but the correct subtraction gives
##(m_2-\mu_km_1)g=-\frac{1}{2}(2m_2+m_1)a_2##

I find problems like this easier to do by using conservation of energy, so that we don't need to try to work out difficult things like what is the upward force on ##m_2##.

Approaching it that way, we can write an equation:

KE of m1 + KE of m2 = loss of PE of m2 + distance moved by m1 x sliding frictional force on m1

This gives an equation in tems of ##s_1,s_2,\dot{s}_1,\dot{s}_2## where ##s_i## is the displacement of mass ##i## from its starting position (so that ##a_i=\ddot{s}_i##). Using your first equation, we can reduce that to an equation in ##s_1## and ##\dot{s}_1##, which is easily solved by integrating and using the initial conditions that, presumably ##\dot{s}_1(0)=0## and defining ##s_1(0)## to be 0.

You can then get the accelerations of the two masses by differentiating, and get the tension from your third equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top