Setting up Forces: Finding Theta of F2

  • Thread starter Thread starter whynot314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Theta
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the angle theta of force F2 to ensure the resultant force on a bracket is directed along the positive u axis with a magnitude of 50 lb. The user expresses uncertainty about their setup and specifically struggles with evaluating the tangent of the angle sum, tan(25° + theta). A suggested approach involves using the angle sum identity for tangent to simplify the calculation. It is recommended to solve for tan(25° + theta) first and then apply the arctangent function to find the angle. The user plans to try this method the following day.
whynot314
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I am curious if I am setting this problem up right.

Three forces act on the bracket. Determine the magnitdue and direction theta of F2 so that the resultant force is directed along the positive u axis and has a magnitude of 50lb.

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130520_221430_zps840432f0.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130520_221430_zps840432f0.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]


[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130520_222748_zps3f68f545.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130520_222748_zps3f68f545.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]

This is how i set it up. If this set up is correct I am having trouble evluating the tan(25+theta) part. If there is an easier way please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry for the verticle photo.
 
whynot314 said:
I am curious if I am setting this problem up right.

Three forces act on the bracket. Determine the magnitdue and direction theta of F2 so that the resultant force is directed along the positive u axis and has a magnitude of 50lb.

[ IMG][ URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130520_221430_zps840432f0.jpg.html][ IMG]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130520_221430_zps840432f0.jpg[/URL]


[ IMG][ URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130520_222748_zps3f68f545.jpg.html][ IMG]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130520_222748_zps3f68f545.jpg[/URL]

This is how i set it up. If this set up is correct I am having trouble evluating the tan(25+theta) part. If there is an easier way please help.
You could use the angle sum identity for tangent: ##\displaystyle \ \tan(\alpha + \beta) = \frac{\tan \alpha + \tan \beta}{1 - \tan \alpha \tan \beta}\ .##

But I think it would be better to solve for tan(25° + θ), then take the arctan of both sides to get a numerical result for 25° + θ . (Make sure that's in degrees.) Subtract 25° from that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhhhh ok thanks, ill try this in the morning.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top