Adiabatic Expansion Homework: C_V, R, P1, V1, P2, V2, Entropy, Temp

kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/9954/72990922.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



I would say the answer to (a) was no but that would be a guess. Does it have to do with the fact that it's done instantaneously, whereas to achieve anything like an irreversible process in reality you have to perform it very slowly?

For (b), Q=0 so the change in internal energy is equal to the work done. This is

W=\frac{C_{V}}{R}(p_{1}V_{1}-p_{2}V_{2})

But I only know the volumes, not the pressures. Is there some way to use the fact that it expands into a vacuum?

I think the entropy change will be zero because no heat is going in or out.

Not sure about the temperature change bit. I would have expected the temperature to change in both. For an ideal gas, if there is some work done then the temperature definitely must change, but how does this differ for a real gas?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's look at this problem in a diferent way. Let's forget about the entropy and (ir)reversibility for the moment. Suppose you have a box that is perfectly insulated and its volume is fixed. Then inside the box 2/3 of the volume is vacuum and 1/3 is filled with a gas. The gas is separated from the vacuum by a boundary that can be removed.

Then this system has some total internal energy. Now, if we remove the boundary, then what does conservation of energy tell you about the total internal energy of the contents of the box?
 
kidsmoker said:
Does it have to do with the fact that it's done instantaneously, whereas to achieve anything like an irreversible process in reality you have to perform it very slowly?

That's exactly what it is. If you had a different process where someone in the external environment could control the macroscopic variables of the gas, manipulate the temperature, pressure and volume however you wished, like many of the problems involving a "movable piston" apparatus, then you would have the ability to make the process occur very slowly. But the process in this problem will occur fast no matter what you do. There are a couple common textbook examples of such a spontaneous and fast, and therefore irreversible, processes. Another example that all of the textbooks cite is the case of a hot solid object and a cold solid object suddenly brought into thermal contact, so that a transfer of heat begins once. There's another case where the spontaneous process cannot be controlled by someone in the environment poking in with a manipulation of macroscopic variables.
 
Last edited:
kidsmoker said:
I think the entropy change will be zero because no heat is going in or out.

Then you have to consider whether the insulation surrounding the system tells the whole story. It's true that the addition or removal of heat will change the entropy of a system, but - is the reverse also true, that as long as a system is insulated then its entropy in constant? Or are there some other events that will change the entropy?
 
kidsmoker said:
I think the entropy change will be zero because no heat is going in or out.
Entropy change is determined by the integral of dQ/T over the reversible path between two states. This is not a reversible path, as you have pointed out. Find a reversible path between these two states and calculate the integral over that path.

AM
 
An abstract (not necessarily better) way to think about this starts from
dU = T dS - p dV.

For an ideal gas, dU = 0 (Things are a little more complicated for real gases).

Hence, T dS = p dV , and
\frac{dS}{dV} = \frac{p}{T}
As pressure is positive, and temperature is positive, we can see that Entropy increases as volume increases.

Inserting the ideal gas equation for p will allow us to integrate for S.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top