Affect of Temperature on Squash Balls experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an IB physics experiment investigating how temperature affects the bounciness of squash balls. The experiment involves dropping five squash balls heated to specific temperatures and measuring their rebound heights. Participants advise against using a Bunsen burner for heating, suggesting instead to heat the balls in water to avoid damage. To measure rebound height accurately, using a fiducial mark with a retort stand is recommended for better precision. Overall, the conversation emphasizes safety and accuracy in conducting the experiment.
iSasha
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi there :)

Homework Statement


I am currently preparing an experiment for IB physics, and I need some help planning how I'm going to carry it out.

We were given the topic "Balls and Rubber Bands", and we could choose freely upon the exact research question. I personally chose "How does the increase of temperature affect the bounciness of squash balls". My teacher approved this topic.

I currently plan to drop 5 different squash balls each time heated to the same, specific temperatures. After having dropped all five balls, I heat them up even more, and repeat the process.

Homework Equations


None as of yet, I guess some basic maths calculations later on to find rebound height.

The Attempt at a Solution


So, here are my questions:
- What is the safest maximum temperature I should heat them up to without destroying the balls? My best guess was around 50 °C.
- What is the best method to heat them up without damaging them? My best guess was to use a bunsen burner and heat it from the side.
- How do I measure the rebound height without using a motion sensor, photoelectric gate, or a laser trigger (according to my teacher, the equipment we have at our school is inadequate)? My best guess was a 1 meter ruler, however I don't see how I would be able to accurately record the rebound height without using technology...Any help would be appreciated. Nothing is set in stone as of yet, so I can still change around the experiment if you guys think that it will be a good idea. If you guys don't think that such a research question will yield a good grade, please tell me so. I would prefer if you guys helped me work it out instead of giving a straight answer like other homework help sites do.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't try to heat squash balls with a bunsen burner !
Accuracy can be improved by repeating results... it is not all down to technology
 
Thanks for the quick response technician!
technician said:
Don't try to heat squash balls with a bunsen burner !
Ok then, what can I use to heat up the balls, without damaging them?

technician said:
Accuracy can be improved by repeating results... it is not all down to technology
Still, the experiment is really innacurate due to the fact that I will have to use my eyes to do the experiment. And I already am using multiple balls, and possibly multiple trials if I have enough time.
 
To help find the height of rebound try to arrange something called a 'fiducial' mark an adjustable stop of some kind that you can gauge the height with.
What is wrong with heating them in water... it is OK to heat the water with a bunsen burner... but care is still needed!
 
technician said:
To help find the height of rebound try to arrange something called a 'fiducial' mark an adjustable stop of some kind that you can gauge the height with.
Great! Now, how do I use this? The only things I could find on google were related to prostate cancer and motion tracking. Sorry for being such a noob :/

technician said:
What is wrong with heating them in water... it is OK to heat the water with a bunsen burner... but care is still needed!
Huh, I thought that water would damage them... BTW, I guess I'll try that.

Thanks again technician!
 
I hope this has got nothing to do with any kind of cancer!
If you are using a retort stand you could use a clamp and raise and lower it until you think you have it at the rebound height... make fine adjustments and you are then comparing the rebound height with a fixed mark... that is what is meant by a fiducial mark.
Heating in water will do a lot less damage than heating with a bunsen burner.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top