Algebraically determine the max height the snowball reaches

lauren
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
my teacher gave me this q:
a snowball if thrown into the air. The function h= -4.9t^2 + 20t + 1.8 expresses the relationship between height, h, in meters and time, t, in seconds.
a) algebraically determine the max height the snowball reaches
b) how long is the snowball in the air?

i know to solve b you just need to plug in your h and solve for t. however for part a, i am not sure how to solve the max. can someone help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have an equation for the velocity of the projectile as a function of time?

If not, do you know that velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time?

In either case, note that the ball reaches its maximum height when the velocity is zero.
 
no, all the info i got to solve this q i posted
 
Have you studied calculus?
 
lauren said:
my teacher gave me this q:
a snowball if thrown into the air. The function h= -4.9t^2 + 20t + 1.8 expresses the relationship between height, h, in meters and time, t, in seconds.
a) algebraically determine the max height the snowball reaches
b) how long is the snowball in the air?

i know to solve b you just need to plug in your h and solve for t. however for part a, i am not sure how to solve the max. can someone help?

h= -4.9t2+ 20t+ 1.8 is a quadratic. Its graph is a parabola with vertex at the top. Complete the square to find the vertex. You don't need to use calculus.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top