Alpha-particle scattering experiment

AI Thread Summary
In Rutherford's alpha-particle scattering experiment, using a thicker foil increases the likelihood of alpha-particles encountering atomic nuclei, leading to greater deflection angles and potential absorption. Higher-energy alpha-particles, however, have a larger velocity component perpendicular to the foil, which reduces deflection angles despite potentially increasing the number of particles that penetrate the foil. When substituting gold with silver, which has a lower atomic number, the weaker electric field results in decreased deflection angles due to a reduced coulombic force acting on the alpha-particles. The discussion highlights the complexities of particle interactions with varying material properties and energies. Understanding these factors is crucial for interpreting experimental results in nuclear physics.
MA103
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck with these questions. Please help if you can.

In Rutherford's experiment, alpha-particles were directed at a thin gold foil. A small fraction of the alpha-particles were back-scattered. Explain how this result would be affected if each of the following changes was (separately) made.
a) A thicker foil was used
b) Higher-energy alpha-particles were used.
c)A silver foil was used - the atomic number is less than that of gold.

c) is fine, I can do that. But a) and b) I seriously need help.

For a) I can thick of two things ...

1) alpha particles will get absorbed. If 1) is right, why is this?

2) because alpha particles will encounter more nucleus of more atoms, there will be more deflected alpha-particles.

For b) I have no idea. I'm guessing there will be more deflection but can't explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) more back scattering
b) more particles getting through, less deflection
 
Hi, thanks but may I ask why for b)?
 
MA103 said:
I'm stuck with these questions. Please help if you can.

In Rutherford's experiment, alpha-particles were directed at a thin gold foil. A small fraction of the alpha-particles were back-scattered. Explain how this result would be affected if each of the following changes was (separately) made.
a) A thicker foil was used
b) Higher-energy alpha-particles were used.
c)A silver foil was used - the atomic number is less than that of gold.

c) is fine, I can do that. But a) and b) I seriously need help.

For a) I can thick of two things ...

1) alpha particles will get absorbed. If 1) is right, why is this?

2) because alpha particles will encounter more nucleus of more atoms, there will be more deflected alpha-particles.

For b) I have no idea. I'm guessing there will be more deflection but can't explain.

The \alpha-particles undergo hyperbolic trajectories when they pass nearby the positively charged gold nuclei. Increasing the thickness of the foil increases the probability of an \alpha-particle experiencing a close encounter with an Au nucleus resulting in greater deflection angles. Higher energy particles possesses a larger component of velocity perpendicular to the foil so I'd say the deflection angle is reduced. Silver has a lower molar mass than gold, the weaker electric field exerts a weaker coulombic force on the \alpha-particles resulting in decreased deflection angles.
 
Thanks for good explanation. :smile:
 
I'm the other way round, a) and b) i could do but c) i need help with!
What difference would it make if a silver foil was used instead of a gold one?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top