Alternating current about resonance width

adrian116
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Since the question quite long and contains many formulas,
so i take a photo instead.

my question is that for part b
since Z= \sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}

can i subst X_L = (W_0+\triangle{\omega})L

and X_C = \frac{1}{(w_0+\triangle{\omega})L}

into the Z= \sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}

if it does, can u show me some of steps ?
I can derive the result from the problem in part b

By the way, what do the amplitude of current is half the resonance value?
is it I=\frac{\omega}{2} ?
 

Attachments

  • Picture0055.jpg
    Picture0055.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 469
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
adrian116 said:
Since the question quite long and contains many formulas,
so i take a photo instead.

my question is that for part b
since Z= \sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}

can i subst X_L = (W_0+\triangle{\omega})L

and X_C = \frac{1}{(w_0+\triangle{\omega})L}
into the Z= \sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}
I think you meant X_C = \frac{1}{(w_0+\triangle{\omega})C}

Yes. Work out the expression for Z by expanding:

Z = \sqrt{R^2+\left((W_0+\Delta{\omega})L -\frac{1}{(w_0+\Delta{\omega})C} \right)^2}

and ignoring the higher order terms of \Delta\omega
By the way, what do the amplitude of current is half the resonance value?
is it I=\frac{\omega}{2} ?
I am not sure I understand your question here. The amplitude of the current is V/Z. Z is not a linear function of \omega

AM
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top