Alternator connected to a long line

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaus tail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alternator Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of disconnecting an alternator from a long transmission line, particularly regarding terminal voltage and the Ferranti effect. One participant argues that the terminal voltage should drop when the alternator is disconnected due to the capacitive current of the line, contradicting the textbook's claim that terminal voltage remains unchanged. Concerns are raised about the unrealistic premise of the problem, noting that the receiving end experiences the highest voltages, which could lead to damaging over-voltages. The conversation also touches on the reliability of the textbook, suggesting that errors may stem from poor authoring and editing practices. Overall, the analysis indicates a strong belief that the textbook's explanation is flawed.
jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2018-1-14_19-11-30.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


I think right answer should be A. Long line on no load is like capacitor so due to ferranti effect the terminal voltage is high. Now when alterator is disconnected the terminal voltage will drop to Ef

The Attempt at a Solution


Book says answer is D. It says due to Ferranti effect, terminal voltage does not change and field current decreases. that's the only explanation given.
Am I wrong or is book wrong?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-14_19-11-30.png
    upload_2018-1-14_19-11-30.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 805
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree. The capacitive current of the transmission line has no place to flow except back to the generator. No matter what the voltage regulator does, the current through the sending end breaker can not be zero prior to opening. So if we interrupt that capacitive current, the terminal voltage should drop instantaneously.

The only question should be, "Would the steady state terminal voltage be substantially different than the time 0+ voltage, while holding field voltage constant?" I would have to think about that. Ping @jim hardy.

Anyhow, option D sounds very unlikely.
 
I should add that the premise of the problem is unrealistic. It is the receiving end of the long line that will experience the highest voltages; potentially damaging over-voltages. Following radial load rejection, frequency also starts increasing rapidly driving receiving end voltage still higher. We would not allow that to persist until steady state before tripping the sending end breaker.

You just made me remember from 50 years ago, my first patent was for a device that diagnosed that situation and initiated an immediate trip.
 
Well it's a pretty safe bet the field gets DC so with constant field voltage one expects constant field current.

Capacitive load current on an alternator produces armature reaction MMF that reinforces the field MMF
so removing that capacitive load will lower flux, in turn lowering terminal voltage.

Is this the same textbook as in your other thread ?
My Mother-In-Law ( a great lady) was a textbook editor for a major publisher.
It is not uncommon for authors to have students write the study example problems .
My Mother-In-Law hired local graduate students to check them for her and she'd resolve mistakes with the author. (There was never a shortage of Grad Students needing part time work in New York City.)
I suggest you approach teacher, if you find the book is fraught with mistakes it reeks of sloppy authoring and editing. Your department head should lodge a complaint with the publisher and the department should go back to a better book.

That's my opinion..

If you find I'm wrong in my analysis please advise.

LATE EDIT see also https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/armature-reaction-drop.826513/#post-5191404
 

Similar threads

Back
Top