Am I setting up this kinematic equation properly?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration, final speed, and stopping distance of a race car that starts from rest and travels a quarter mile in 12.1 seconds with constant acceleration. The calculated acceleration is approximately 5.5 m/s², and the final speed is 66.5 m/s. For the stopping distance, the user initially used the wrong reference point, leading to an impractical distance of 1507.8 meters, which was later corrected to 1105.5 meters after adjusting the starting point to zero. The conversation highlights that a braking acceleration of -2.00 m/s² is considered modest, with safer braking typically around 0.5g. The importance of terminology is also noted, emphasizing the correct use of "braking" instead of "breaking."
TaylorHoward21
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
A race car starts from rest and goes a quarter mile (1/4 mi) in 12.1 seconds. Assume the acceleration of the car is constant. (a.) What is the acceleration of the car? (b.) What is the final speed of the car? (c.) If you hit the brakes, how far would it take to stop the car if the breaks cause an acceleration of -2.00 m/s2?

I believe I have parts a and b right, however I am not confident with my process of solving part C.


1/4 mi ≈ 402.3 m

a.) acceleration = 5.5m/s^2
b.) Final speed (at 12.1 seconds) = 66.5 m/s

c.) For part C, I reset the known values to:
a = -2.00m/s2
V0 = 66.5m/s
V = 0 (because solving for car stop which is zero velocity)
X0 = 402.3m

The equation I used: v2 - V20 = 2a(x - x0)
The answer I got was 1507.8m = x
For a car going 66.5m/s that is slowing down at -2.00 m/s2 does this answer seem practical? I am struggling to check my work here.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TaylorHoward21 said:
X0 = 402.3m
It asks how far the car goes after hitting the brakes. The distance already traveled is not relevant.
 
haruspex said:
It asks how far the car goes after hitting the brakes. The distance already traveled is not relevant.
So if I change X0 to be = 0 the new answer I get is 1105.5m. This still seems rather far for a car to stop from 66.5m/s to 0m/s. Is -2.00m/s^2 simply just a very slow breaking acceleration?
 
TaylorHoward21 said:
Is -2.00m/s^2 simply just a very slow breaking acceleration?
It is rather modest. Safe but serious braking is about 0.5g on a dry road. Emergency braking could go as high as 0.7-1g, depending on the vehicle.

And it is "braking", using "brakes", not "breaking".
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top