Ampere Law in a hole Should give zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Ampere's Law to a scenario involving a cable with a drilled hole. The key question raised is why the magnetic field can be non-zero at a point where an Ampere loop, centered on the hole, encloses no current. The response clarifies that while the magnetic field contribution from the hole is zero, the magnetic field from the surrounding cable is not, leading to a net non-zero magnetic field at that point. The principle of superposition is emphasized, indicating that the total magnetic field is the sum of contributions from both the cable and the hole. Understanding these contributions is crucial for accurately applying Ampere's Law in this context.
Neverthelessif
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I just did an exercice and there is one point that I don't understand (about Ampere's law).

Homework Statement



The exercice was about a cable with given diameter a, in which a small hole with diameter b is drilled in. The axis of the cable and the hole are parallel and the distance between the axis is given as r. There is a uniform steady current density flowing through it.
The question is to calculate the magnetic field at the center of cable and center of the hole.

2. Useful equations

Ampere's Law


Don't worry, I won't ask you to answer the exercice for me since I more or less finished it, I was just wondering: if I choose as Ampere's loop to be a circle centered in the hole, and with a radius smaller than b, why can't we say that the magnetic field equals ZERO because there is no current flowing through that circle anyhow?

What is to be done is to add up both magnetic fields by superposition and therefore we indeed have the sum of the magnetic filed of the hole being ZERO, plus the magnetic field of the cable which is NOT zero at that point.


So here is the question, black on white: How come we can have a non-zero magnetic field at a point in space around which we can draw an Ampere loop/surface through which there is zero current going through?


Thank you very much for your time :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me like you already answered your own question.

"What is to be done is to add up both magnetic fields by superposition and therefore we indeed have the sum of the magnetic filed of the hole being ZERO, plus the magnetic field of the cable which is NOT zero at that point."

You are interested in the sum of individual contributions. Think about if you had a wire with current flow and were trying to determine the resultant magnetic field. You could have any number of ampere loops in which the wire is not enclosed and their resulting contribution is still zilch.
In your problem with the ampere loop from r = 0 to r = b is telling you that there is no contribution to the magnetic field from this portion of space since there is no current flow there.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top