An Atwood's Machine lab question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinky2468
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Machine
AI Thread Summary
In the Atwood's Machine lab, a significant concern arose regarding a 40-50% difference in percentage measurements, which is much higher than the ideal 10-15%. Accurate and precise measurements are crucial, and using the correct instruments and units is essential. The experimental setup must be checked for proper alignment, ensuring the pulley is frictionless and the masses are balanced. Additionally, verifying calculations and formulas is necessary to avoid errors. Collaboration with the lab partner and seeking instructor guidance can help identify and rectify potential issues.
pinky2468
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I have a question...When you take times/measurements in lab, is the %difference supposed to be 40-50%? That seems like a lot to me! My lab partner took the measurements and I am suposed to do the calculations at home, but I am getting huge % difference for all but one of the 5 trials! We are using the acceleration theory equation versus the acceleration experiment. Can anyone help me with this so I don't totally mess up my lab because of my lab partner?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly were you measuring and are you applying the theory correctly? How are you making the measurements? It's hard to say what kind of errors you will get without some detail.
 


Hello there,

Thank you for reaching out with your question about the Atwood's Machine lab. It is understandable that you are concerned about the large percentage differences in your measurements. Ideally, the percentage difference should not be more than 10-15%, so a 40-50% difference does seem quite high.

There could be a few reasons for this discrepancy. Firstly, it is important to ensure that your measurements are accurate and precise. Make sure that you are using the correct units and that your measurements are taken with the appropriate instruments. It is also important to take multiple readings and calculate the average to minimize errors.

Another factor to consider is the experimental setup. If the Atwood's Machine is not set up properly, it can affect the accuracy of your measurements. Make sure that the pulley is frictionless and the string is taut. Also, check that the masses are balanced on either side of the pulley.

Lastly, it is important to double-check your calculations and equations. Make sure that you are using the correct formula and inputting the correct values. If your lab partner took the measurements, it is possible that there could have been errors in recording the data.

I would suggest discussing this issue with your lab partner and going through the steps together to identify any potential sources of error. It is important to work together and communicate effectively to ensure accurate results. If you are still unsure, do not hesitate to ask your instructor for assistance.

I hope this helps and good luck with your lab!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top