An emf self-induced in a solenoid of inductance L changes. .

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the total charge that passes through a solenoid with a self-induced emf described by E=E_0e^(-kt). Participants express confusion about how to derive the charge from the emf, noting that the induced emf is given by E_L=-L(dI/dt). There's a realization that the problem requires integrating to find charge over time, rather than differentiating. One contributor suggests using the relationship between voltage, charge, and inductance, emphasizing the need to express charge in terms of the exponential function. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the correct application of integration and the relationships between emf, current, and charge in inductive circuits.
Adn4n
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
An emf self-induced in a solenoid of inductance L changes in time as
E=E_0e^(-kt)
Find the total charge that passes through the solenoid, if the charge is finite. (Use E_0 for 0, k, and L as necessary.)

Now I know that the induced emf is

E_L=-L(dI/dt)
I'm having a hard time on this problem since I'm looking for the charge, and not for the current which I believe I have to determine in the first place. I'm not sure how to exactly find di/dt and then relate it to the charge. Could anyone assist with this please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that I have to take the integral of an equation twice, though I do not know how to incorporate L and the given equation into one really.
 
I don't see any integration, but rather differentiation. They tell you that E = E_0 e^{-kt} - this is a given correct? So, what about using chain rule to find \frac{di}{dt}, which will give you charge?
 
I know how to differentiate the equation, but I don't know how that gives me dI/dt, could you elaborate?
 
Oh, whoops, I think I misinterpreted the problem. It is not asking you to find the rate of change of voltage with respect to charge, that's what I thought at least. This is really just some algebra to find Q(t).

I can put you on the right track if you want. Your equation for the voltage (EMF) in an inductor could be wrong, though I'm not really sure what sign convention was used for the polarity through the inductor in the circuit you are analyzing (so it could be either positive or negative, but it is usually positive). Anyway, you have already said that you know charge as being proportional to voltage and inversely proportional to inductance. You also said that you know voltage is proportional to the exponential function. Use equalities and you can get charge in terms of the exponential.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top