Analyzing Electromagnetic Radiation Intensity: N Antennas with Random Phases

buttersrocks
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. Consider N similar antennas emitting linearly polarized electromagnetic radiation of wavelength \lambda and velocity c. The antennas are located along the x-axis at a separation \lambda form each other. An observer is located on the x-axis at a great distance from the antennas. When a single antenna radiates, the observer measures an intensity (i.e., mean-square electric-field amplitude) equal to I.

(a) If all the antennas are driven in phase by the same generator of frequency \nu = c / \lambda, what is the total intensity measured by the observer?


(b) If the antennas all radiate at the same frequency \nu=c / \lambda but with completely random phases, what is the mean intensity measured by the observer? (Hint: Represent the amplitudes by vectors, and deduce the observed intensity from the resultant amplitude.)

Homework Equations


None in particular3. The Attempt at a Solution
I know the answer to part (a) should be I(n^2). My problem is when I get to part b. Using E(X) to mean the expectation value of X, I get the following:


The first sum on the left isn't displaying like it should. The entire Sum should be squared, not just the Ai. That's only true for the lefthand sides.


E\left[{\left(\sum_i{A_i}\right)}^2\right]=E\left[\sum_i{A_i^2}+\sum_{i \neq j}{A_i A_j}\right]
E\left[(\sum_i{A_i})^2\right]=\sum_i{E\left[A_i^2\right]}+\sum_{i \neq j}E\left[A_i A_j\right]

At this point I know that the leftmost sum is nI and that the rightmost sum is functions of two independent random variables multiplied together, which is just the expected values of each multiplied together and therefore 0. So, I get nI as my final answer. This just doesn't sit right though because it seems to me that if the phase is entirely random, as n->infinity we should see a flat E-field (it would be equally likely for any particular A to be in phase as out of phase with any other and since they would be in equal numbers, they should all cancel out) and therefore the expected intensity should be 0. What am I doing wrong, or, is my intuition leading me astray?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
solution

Hi,
Figured since nobody replied either A, nobody cares or B, nobody knows the answer. I wrote a lil computer code to do a bit of an experiment. Turns out that my nI answer is correct. I interpret it as follows:

The nI is the result of the intensity due to each individual antenna as if the others were not even present. Because we expect the interferences send the e-field to zero, there is no collective contribution. The way I'm thinking about it, from the perspective of each antenna the E field remains unperturbed by the other N-1 antennas as N-> infinity, since for each constructive contribution there is an equal destructive contribution, therefore negating any change made. I guess, in a manner of speaking, what really matters is the phase differences to one another, which are equally likely to be constructive and destructive.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top