Why Does a Simple Pendulum Have a Constant ω If Its Velocity Changes?

AI Thread Summary
A simple pendulum maintains a constant angular frequency (ω) despite changes in velocity due to the nature of simple harmonic motion (SHM). The angular frequency is defined as ω = √(g/l), where g is gravitational acceleration and l is the length of the pendulum, indicating it is a fixed property of the system. While the pendulum's velocity varies over time, this variation is periodic and corresponds to the oscillation described by ω. The confusion arises from the distinction between instantaneous angular velocity and the constant angular frequency associated with the motion. Ultimately, ω reflects the rate of oscillation rather than the instantaneous speed of the pendulum bob.
bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


How does a simple pendulum have a constant ω if it's velocity changes?

Homework Equations


(1) v=ωR
(2) \omega=\stackrel{\sqrt{l}}{\sqrt{g}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Very confused about this. The pendulum bob is at a fixed distance from where it's attached (i.e R is constant). It seems to me that if the velocity changes, from the equations above, the angular frequency has also got to change. I thought perhaps that the angular frequency derived from SHM was perhaps an average and not instantaneous? But I'm not so sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple pendulum's velocity does change with time, but it changes periodically with the angular frequency \omega. The acceleration of the pendulum as well as the posiiton of the pendulum also change with time, but periodically with angular frequency \omega.

If you think of the position function with time as being a sine wave

x(t) = X_{0}Sin[\omega t + \phi]

the time derivative of this (i.e. the velocity) will also be a sine wave (a cosine wave has the same shape and behavior in any case)

v(t)= \dot{x}(t) = \omega X_{0}Cos[\omega t + \phi]

Similarly, differentiating again gives us the acceleration which also varies sinusoidally with the same frequency \omega

a(t) \ddot{x}(t) = -\omega^{2}X_{0}Sin[\omega t + \phi]
Note that here we can write the acceleration in terms of the position, and see that sine waves are solutions to the simple harmonic oscillator equation

\ddot{x}(t) = -\omega^{2}x(t)

So in short, the constant \omega does not refer to the instantaneous angular velocity, but it gives how rapidly the instantaneous angular velocity oscillates with time.

In particular, if you look at the time averages of x(t)^{2} and v(t)^{2}, you can show that

\omega = \sqrt{\frac{<v^{2}>}{<x^{2}>}}
 
bananabandana said:
Very confused about this. The pendulum bob is at a fixed distance from where it's attached (i.e R is constant). It seems to me that if the velocity changes, from the equations above, the angular frequency has also got to change. I thought perhaps that the angular frequency derived from SHM was perhaps an average and not instantaneous? But I'm not so sure.

I know what you mean. Its natural to get confused, but ω represents different things in both equations.

In ##v=ωr##, ω isn't constant because gravity applies torque. : here ω means angular velocity

in ## ω= \sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}##, ω is constant- its a value associated with Simple harmonic motion, which jfizzix has explained above. : here ω means angular frequency
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top