Why Don't Angular Momentum and the Square of Momentum Commute?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum (L) and the square of momentum (P^2) do not commute due to the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding conservation laws. The calculations presented show that the commutator leads to a conclusion that suggests L and P^2 must commute for angular momentum to be conserved in free particles. The discussion highlights a common misconception in the manipulation of commutators, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying the product rule. Ultimately, the consensus is that L and P^2 do commute, aligning with the conservation of angular momentum in a free particle scenario. This understanding is crucial for resolving related mathematical problems in quantum mechanics.
Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I have been told that L and P^2 do not commute, but I don't see why. It seems like the commutator should be zero.

<br /> <br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i P_i \right]<br /> = \left[ L_k , P_i \right] P_i - P_i \left[ L_k , P_i \right]<br /> = \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} P_m \right) P_i - P_i \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} P_m \right) <br /> = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} \left( P_m P_i - P_i P_m \right) <br /> = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} \left[ P_m , P_i \right] <br /> = 0<br /> <br />

What is wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I found one mistake but it still leads me to the same conclusion. The second equality should be plus, not minus: [A,BC] = [A,B]C+B[A,C]:

<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i P_i \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i \right] P_i + P_i \left[ L^k , P_i \right] = \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m \right) P_i + P_i \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m \right) = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} \left( P_m P_i + P_i P_m \right)<br />
and since P_m , P_i commute,
<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = - 2 i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m P_i = 2 \left[ L^k , P_i \right] P_i = 2 \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right]<br />
but the only thing which satisfies
<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = 2 \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right]<br />
is zero.
So I'm back to saying that L and P^2 commute. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Your calculations are correct. If \hat{L}_i did not commute with \hat{P}^2, angular momentum would not be conserved for a free particle.
 
fzero, I didn't even think of that! A free particle would have zero potential energy, so for L to be conserved it would still have to commute with the Hamiltonian, and that means L and P^2 must commute (2m factor is irrelevant). I thought for sure I was making a mistake somewhere since my mind is a notorious hangout for mathematical absurdities. Maybe I can get some points back that were taken off on my test. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top