Angular momentum eigenstates and total mom. S?

AI Thread Summary
To find the total angular momentum S of a spin-2 particle, use the formula J(J+1)|j,m>, where J is the spin quantum number. For spin-2, the eigenvalue of total angular momentum squared is S^2 = s(s+1)(h-bar)^2 with s = 2. The treatment is similar to spin-1/2 particles, with angular momentum components adding together, especially when considering non-zero orbital angular momentum. The value of J for a spin-2 particle can range from 0 to 2, so it's crucial to determine the specific J value for accurate calculations. Consulting additional resources may enhance understanding of spin-2 particles.
qqchico
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
My problem is with finding total angular momentum S of a spin 2 particles. My quantum book doesn't do any examples with spin 2 particles do i just do
J(J+1)|j,m> and just plug in j and that will be my value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming zero orbital angular momentum, L = 0, then the eigenvalue of the total angular momentum squared is just S^2 = s(s+1)*(h-bar)^2, with s = 2.

Generally, the treatment of the problem is the same as with spin-1/2 particles, so the orbital- and spin-components of angular momentum add together as usual in the case of non-zero orbital angular momentum, ie j goes between abs(l - s) and abs(l+s) in integer steps, then l(l+1)*(h-bar)^2 is the eigenvalue of L^2.

Cheyne
 
Last edited:


Yes, you are correct in your approach. The total angular momentum of a spin 2 particle can be calculated using the formula J(J+1)|j,m>, where J is the spin quantum number and m is the magnetic quantum number. You can simply plug in the appropriate value for J and calculate the total angular momentum. However, it is important to note that the value of J for a spin 2 particle can range from 0 to 2, so you will need to determine the specific value of J for your particle in order to accurately calculate the total angular momentum. Additionally, it may be helpful to consult other sources or textbooks for examples of spin 2 particles to gain a better understanding of the concept.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top