Angular Momentum of a particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of angular momentum, specifically addressing the misconception that a body rotating about a fixed axis does not possess angular momentum. Participants clarify that angular momentum (L) is defined as L = Iω for rotating bodies, where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity. Additionally, it is established that even a non-rotating mass can have angular momentum relative to a point, as expressed by L = r x p, where r is the position vector and p is the linear momentum. The relationship between torque and angular momentum is also clarified, with torque being the time derivative of angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum (L = Iω)
  • Familiarity with torque as the derivative of angular momentum
  • Knowledge of position vectors and linear momentum
  • Basic grasp of vector cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum for rigid bodies
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Explore the relationship between torque and angular momentum in detail
  • Investigate the implications of angular momentum conservation in closed systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly those studying rotational dynamics and angular momentum concepts.

saiaspire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Angular Momentum...

Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

how is this possible... please help me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any rotating mass has angular momentum. It's magnitude can also be given by,

L = I \omega

where I is moment of inertia. The direction of the vector is given by the right hand rule.Try taking the derivative of the angular momentum with respect to time

L = r \times p
 
Last edited:
what said:
Any rotating mass has angular momentum.
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p
 
\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p

Usually we assume that

\frac {dr}{dt} = 0 Hence

\tau = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} = r \times F
 
Last edited:
jdg812 said:
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p

Yes, but it's a zero vector.
 
Last edited:
what said:
Yes, but it's a zero vector.
I do not think so...
If a mass does not rotate around its own center and does not rotate around other center ("O" in the picture), just moving straight, it still may have non-zero angular momentum.
 

Attachments

  • momang.gif
    momang.gif
    6 KB · Views: 486
Last edited:
Yes you are right jdg812, I kept r constant. You can zip by O in a straight light and have angular momentum with respect to O. In this case, r is a variable.

L = mvr \sin(\phi)

As long as

\sin(\phi), p, r

is not zero you have non-zero angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
saiaspire said:
Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

OK

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

No, it doesn't mean that at all. You can view a rotating body as a collection of particles orbiting a common axis. What you do is compute the differential angular momentum for a particle in the body whose mass is dm. This gives you the angular momentum for just that one piece of the body. Then you integrate over the entire body to get the total angular momentum. Since all the particles are orbiting the axis of rotation in the same direction, the result can't possibly be zero.

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

Other way around. Torque is the time derivative of angular momentum.
 
what said:
\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p

Usually we assume that

\frac {dr}{dt} = 0

It doesn't matter if you assume d\vec{r}/dt=0. d\vec{r}/dt is parallel to \vec{p}. The cross product of any two parallel vectors is zero.
 
  • #10
thanks guys...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
799
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
843
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K