Angular Momentum of a particle

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is a vector quantity that depends on both the linear momentum of a particle and its position relative to a point, expressed as L = r x p. A body rotating about a fixed axis does possess angular momentum, as it can be viewed as a collection of particles each contributing to the total angular momentum. The confusion arises from the misconception that non-rotating bodies cannot have angular momentum; they can, depending on their linear motion relative to a reference point. Torque is the time derivative of angular momentum, not the other way around. Understanding these concepts clarifies that both rotating and non-rotating bodies can have non-zero angular momentum under certain conditions.
saiaspire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Angular Momentum...

Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

how is this possible... please help me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any rotating mass has angular momentum. It's magnitude can also be given by,

L = I \omega

where I is moment of inertia. The direction of the vector is given by the right hand rule.Try taking the derivative of the angular momentum with respect to time

L = r \times p
 
Last edited:
waht said:
Any rotating mass has angular momentum.
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p
 
\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p

Usually we assume that

\frac {dr}{dt} = 0 Hence

\tau = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} = r \times F
 
Last edited:
jdg812 said:
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p

Yes, but it's a zero vector.
 
Last edited:
waht said:
Yes, but it's a zero vector.
I do not think so...
If a mass does not rotate around its own center and does not rotate around other center ("O" in the picture), just moving straight, it still may have non-zero angular momentum.
 

Attachments

  • momang.gif
    momang.gif
    6 KB · Views: 478
Last edited:
Yes you are right jdg812, I kept r constant. You can zip by O in a straight light and have angular momentum with respect to O. In this case, r is a variable.

L = mvr \sin(\phi)

As long as

\sin(\phi), p, r

is not zero you have non-zero angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
saiaspire said:
Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

OK

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

No, it doesn't mean that at all. You can view a rotating body as a collection of particles orbiting a common axis. What you do is compute the differential angular momentum for a particle in the body whose mass is dm. This gives you the angular momentum for just that one piece of the body. Then you integrate over the entire body to get the total angular momentum. Since all the particles are orbiting the axis of rotation in the same direction, the result can't possibly be zero.

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

Other way around. Torque is the time derivative of angular momentum.
 
waht said:
\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p

Usually we assume that

\frac {dr}{dt} = 0

It doesn't matter if you assume d\vec{r}/dt=0. d\vec{r}/dt is parallel to \vec{p}. The cross product of any two parallel vectors is zero.
 
  • #10
thanks guys...
 
Back
Top